ReviewVascular health and risk management2020
An Overview of the Treatment of Symptomatic Common Femoral Artery Lesions with a Focus on Endovascular Therapy.
Review in Vascular health and risk management, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06829914 (Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endovascular Therapy Versus Open Surgery for Common Femoral Artery Atherosclerotic Occlusive Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Intravascular Lithotripsy for Peripheral Artery Calcification: 30-Day Outcomes From the Disrupt PAD III Observational Study.Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists · 2026Observational
- Dense Calcification of the Common Femoral Artery Is Protective Against In-Stent Restenosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Shockwave Versus Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Design and Rationale of the SHOCKIFY Trial.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Femoropopliteal Interventions for Peripheral Artery Disease: A Review of Current Evidence and Future Directions.Interventional cardiology clinics · 2025Review
- Endovascular balloon angioplasty for infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease: Efficacy analysis.Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2021Article
- Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy in the Treatment of Calcified Common Femoral Artery Disease.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endarterectomy of common femoral artery lesions (CFA) carries favorable long-term results and is currently still considered the gold standard for treating these lesions. Although routine stenting has been considered an option for treating the CFA, it has yielded conflicting results and is currently reserved for a bailout of suboptimal endovascular results. Newer therapies with atherectomy or lithoplasty in conjunction with pharmacologic anti-proliferative therapies are promising with less bailout stenting and dissections but randomized trials are needed to confirm their effectiveness and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.