Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32110005›Full record

ArticleClinical interventions in aging2020

The Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI): New Evidence for Its Validity.

Robbert Jj Gobbens, Petra Boersma, Izabella Uchmanowicz, Livia Maria Santiago

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06688591 (Effectiveness of an Evidence-based Multi-component Intervention Programme to Reduce Medication-related Problems Among Polymedicated Home-dwelling Older Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06688591 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of an Evidence-based Multi-component Intervention Programme to Reduce Medication-related Problems Among Polymedicated Home-dwelling Older Adults: Protocol for a Multi-site Pilot Study of the OptiMed Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHES-SO Valais-WallisRan2021 to 2023Enrolled0ConditionsPolypharmacy, Multiple Chronic ConditionsArmsIntervention programme to optimise medication management and prevent MRPs
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Correlates of frailty in older female cancer survivors.Journal of geriatric oncology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Epigenetic and Metabolomic Biomarkers for Biological Age: A Comparative Analysis of Mortality and Frailty Risk.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robbert Jj GobbensFaculty of Health, Sports and Social Work, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6225-5189
Petra BoersmaFaculty of Health, Sports and Social Work, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Izabella UchmanowiczDivision of Nursing in Internal Medicine Procedures, Department of Clinical Nursing, The Faculty of Health Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8002-2052
Livia Maria SantiagoFaculty of Medicine, Department of Speech and Language Pathology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3784-9388

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) is a self-report user-friendly questionnaire for assessing multidimensional frailty among community-dwelling older people. The main aim of this study is to re-evaluate the validity of the TFI, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally, focusing on the predictive value of the total TFI and its physical, psychological, and social domains for adverse outcomes disability, indicators of healthcare utilization, and falls.

methodsThe validity of the TFI was determined in a sample of 180 Dutch community-dwelling older people aged 70 years and older. The participants completed questionnaires including the TFI, the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale (GARS) for assessing disability, and questions with regard to health care utilization and falls in 2016 and again one year later.

resultsThe physical and psychological domains of the TFI were significantly correlated as expected with adverse outcomes disability, many indicators of healthcare utilization, and falls. Regression analyses showed that physical frailty was mostly responsible for the effect of frailty on the adverse outcomes. The cross-sectional and longitudinal predictive validity of total frailty with respect to disability and receiving personal care was excellent, evidenced by Areas Under the Curves (AUCs) >0.8. In most cases, using the cut-off point 5 for total frailty ensured the best values for sensitivity and specificity.

conclusionThe present study provided new, additional evidence for the validity of the TFI for assessing frailty in Dutch community-dwelling older people aiming to prevent or delay adverse outcomes, including disability.

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyAccidental FallsAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDisability EvaluationFemaleFrailtyGeriatric AssessmentHealth StatusHumansIndependent LivingLongitudinal StudiesMaleNetherlandsPersons with Disabilitiesdisabilityfrailtyolder peopleTilburg Frailty Indicatorvalidity

Identifiers

PMID32110005
PMCPMC7041595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.