ArticleThe Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy
Efficacy, Safety, and Practicality of Tacrolimus Monitoring after Bone Marrow Transplant: Assessment of a Change in Practice.
Article in The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Planning Intermittent CalciNeurin Inhibitor Controls-The piCNIc Retrospective Cohort Study.Clinical transplantation · 2026Observational
- Synthetic Pharmacotherapy for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Potential Mechanisms of Action, Efficacy, and Safety.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Review
- The impact of tacrolimus levels on acute GVHD and transplant outcomes in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A retrospective analysis.Cell transplantationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrently, there is no standardized approach to the frequency of monitoring tacrolimus levels in patients who have undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Previously, the practice at the study hospital was to monitor tacrolimus levels daily throughout a patient's admission. A recent institutional study suggested that measurement of tacrolimus level is more frequent than needed to achieve consistent time in the therapeutic range (TTR), particularly after the first 7 days. As a result, tacrolimus monitoring was changed to daily measurement for the initial week of therapy, followed by measurements on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday in subsequent weeks.
objectiveTo confirm the safety and efficacy of the recent practice change.
methodsThis retrospective chart review of HSCT patients admitted to The Ottawa Hospital involved 68 patients in the pre-practice change group and 43 patients in the post-practice change group. Data on tacrolimus measurement were collected for up to 21 days after initiation of this medication. The proportion of TTR was compared between the 2 groups. Differences in the incidence and severity of renal dysfunction and the incidence of acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) were determined and described.
resultsIn the pre-practice change cohort, the median proportion of TTR for tacrolimus was 40.5% for days 1-7, 65.1% for days 8-14, and 78.9% for days 15-21, similar to the values for the post-practice change group (46.6% [
conclusionThe proportion of TTR for tacrolimus was not significantly affected by the recent practice change. Similarly, the incidence and severity of renal dysfunction and the incidence of acute GVHD did not appear to differ between the pre- and post-practice change groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32109959PMC7023932What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.