Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32109746›Full record

ArticleJournal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences2020

Quantitation of phenanthrene dihydrodiols in the urine of smokers and non-smokers by gas chromatography-negative ion chemical ionization-tandem mass spectrometry.

Kai Luo, J Bradley Hochalter, Steven G Carmella, Stephen S Hecht

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kai LuoMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
J Bradley HochalterMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Steven G CarmellaMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Stephen S HechtMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Electronic address: hecht002@umn.edu.
University of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI HEATHER Hammond NELSON · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
Untargeted Adductomics to Characterize Ethnic Differences in the Exposome of SmokersP01CA138338 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI DOROTHY K HATSUKAMI · 2010 to 2026
$33.4M
e-Cigarettes: Formaldehyde DNA Adducts, Oxidative Damage, and Potential Toxicity and CarcinogenesisR01CA203851 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HECHT, STEPHEN S · 2017 to 2021
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA138338NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NCI NIH HHS R01 CA203851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) are well-established environmental carcinogens likely to be causative agents for some human cancers. Bay-region diol epoxides are ultimate carcinogenic metabolites of multiple PAH. Dihydrodiols are the important intermediate products of this pathway and can be further oxidized to form diol epoxides. We quantified two dihydrodiol metabolites of phenanthrene (Phe), the simplest PAH with a bay-region, in the 6 h urine of smokers (N = 25) and non-smokers (N = 25) using a newly developed and validated analytical method. After hydrolysis by ß-glucuronidase and sulfatase, and solid phase extraction, the sample was silylated and analyzed by gas chromatography-negative ion chemical ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-NICI-MS/MS). Levels (nmol/6h urine) of Phe-1,2-dihydrodiol (Phe-1,2-D) and Phe-3,4-dihydrodiol (Phe-3,4-D) were 2.04 ± 1.52 and 0.51 ± 0.35 , respectively, in smokers, significantly higher than those in non-smokers (1.35 ± 1.11 of Phe-1,2-D, p < 0.05; 0.27 ± 0.25 of Phe-3,4-D, p < 0.005). Cigarette smoking also influenced the regioselective metabolism of Phe, presenting as a significant difference in the urinary distribution pattern of Phe-1,2-D and Phe-3,4-D between smokers and non-smokers: the ratio Phe-3,4-D: Phe-1,2-D increased from 0.20 in non-smokers to 0.28 in smokers (p < 0.01), which can be explained by the induction of the phenanthrene metabolizing enzymes CYP1A2 and CYP1B1 by cigarette smoke. The method described here is the first example of facile quantitation of an intact human dihydrodiol metabolite of any PAH with three or more aromatic rings and will be applicable in clinical and molecular epidemiology studies of PAH metabolism and cancer susceptibility.

Indexed as

FemaleGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansLimit of DetectionLinear ModelsMaleNaphthalenesPhenanthrenesReproducibility of ResultsSmokersSmokingTandem Mass SpectrometryNaphthalenesphenanthrenePhenanthrenestrans-1,2-dihydro-1,2-naphthalenediolBioactivationCigarette SmokeDihydrodiolPhenanthrene

Identifiers

PMID32109746
PMCPMC7377154
OpenAlexW3004521847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.