ReviewThe Lancet. Haematology2020
Imaging haemopoietic stem cells and microenvironment dynamics through transplantation.
Review in The Lancet. Haematology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- DecodingAcute GVHD: The role of serum biomarkers and imaging in diagnosis and management.Blood reviews · 2025Review
- Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis after autologous stem cell transplantation in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2023Article
- Ferumoxytol: Another Exciting Addition to the Growing Field of Bone Marrow Imaging.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2023Article
- Advances in Imaging of Inflammation, Fibrosis, and Cancer in the Gastrointestinal Tract.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the subclinical pathway to cellular engraftment following haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has historically been limited by infrequent marrow biopsies, which increase the risk of infections and might poorly represent the health of the marrow space. Nuclear imaging could represent an opportunity to evaluate the entire medullary space non-invasively, yielding information about cell number, proliferation, or metabolism. Because imaging is not associated with infectious risk, it permits assessment of neutropenic timepoints that were previously inaccessible. This Viewpoint summarises the data regarding the use of nuclear medicine techniques to assess the phases of HSCT: pre-transplant homoeostasis, induced aplasia, early settling and engraftment of infused cells, and later recovery of lymphocytes that target cancers or mediate tolerance. Although these data are newly emerging and preliminary, nuclear medicine imaging approaches might advance our understanding of HSCT events and lead to novel recommendations to enhance outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.