Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32109227›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

A toxin-antidote CRISPR gene drive system for regional population modification.

Jackson Champer, Esther Lee, Emily Yang, Chen Liu, Andrew G Clark, Philipp W Messer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The evolutionary genomics of meiotic drive.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  5. Predicting the invasiveness of threshold-dependent gene drives.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Engineering drive-selection balance for localized population suppression with neutral dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jackson ChamperDepartment of Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA. jc3248@cornell.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3814-3774
Esther LeeDepartment of Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Emily YangDepartment of Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Chen LiuDepartment of Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Andrew G ClarkDepartment of Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7159-8511
Philipp W MesserDepartment of Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA. messer@cornell.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8453-9377

Funding

Evolutionary dynamics of CRISPR gene drives in natural populationsR01GM127418 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI MESSER, PHILIPP W · 2018 to 2022
$1.6M
Improving the efficiency and control of CRISPR/Cas9 gene drive systemsR21AI130635 · NIAID · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI CLARK, ANDREW G, MESSER, PHILIPP W · 2017 to 2018
$431k
Dynamics of Gene Drives in Natural PopulationsF32AI138476 · NIAID · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI CHAMPER, JACKSON · 2018 to 2020
$192k
NIAID NIH HHS F32 AI138476NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI130635NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM127418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Engineered gene drives based on a homing mechanism could rapidly spread genetic alterations through a population. However, such drives face a major obstacle in the form of resistance against the drive. In addition, they are expected to be highly invasive. Here, we introduce the Toxin-Antidote Recessive Embryo (TARE) drive. It functions by disrupting a target gene, forming recessive lethal alleles, while rescuing drive-carrying individuals with a recoded version of the target. Modeling shows that such drives will have threshold-dependent invasion dynamics, spreading only when introduced above a fitness-dependent frequency. We demonstrate a TARE drive in Drosophila with 88-95% transmission by female heterozygotes. This drive was able to spread through a large cage population in just six generations following introduction at 24% frequency without any apparent evolution of resistance. Our results suggest that TARE drives constitute promising candidates for the development of effective, flexible, and regionally confinable drives for population modification.

Indexed as

AntidotesModels, GeneticAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCRISPR-Cas SystemsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsFemaleGene Drive TechnologyGenetics, PopulationHeterozygoteMutationProtein EngineeringAntidotesDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32109227
PMCPMC7046741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.