Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32108918›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2020

Keratoconus detection by novel indices in patients with Down syndrome: a cohort population-based study.

Hassan Hashemi, Mohammad Miraftab, Kazem Amanzadeh, Mohammad Amin Seyedian, Riccardo Vinciguerra, Renato Ambrósio, Cynthia Roberts, Ali Makateb, Paolo Vinciguerra, Soheila Asgari

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Keratoconus.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Systemic Associations with Keratoconus.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. The Underlying Relationship between Keratoconus and Down Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Hassan HashemiNoor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye Hospital, No. 96 Esfandiar Blvd, Vali'asr Ave, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad MiraftabNoor Research Center for Ophthalmic Epidemiology, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
Kazem AmanzadehNoor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye Hospital, No. 96 Esfandiar Blvd, Vali'asr Ave, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Amin SeyedianNoor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye Hospital, No. 96 Esfandiar Blvd, Vali'asr Ave, Tehran, Iran.
Riccardo VinciguerraSt Paul's Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Renato AmbrósioRio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Cynthia RobertsDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Ali MakatebNoor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye Hospital, No. 96 Esfandiar Blvd, Vali'asr Ave, Tehran, Iran.
Paolo VinciguerraDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele Milan, Italy.
Soheila AsgariNoor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye Hospital, No. 96 Esfandiar Blvd, Vali'asr Ave, Tehran, Iran. soheilaasgari@gmail.com.
Noor Eye Hospital · IRHumanitas University · ITRoyal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust · GBThe Ohio State University · USUniversidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo use novel indices to determine the prevalence of KC and its progression in patients aged 10-30 years with Down syndrome. STUDY

designCohort population-based study.

methodsTwo hundred twenty-six of 250 invited Down syndrome patients were enrolled. The diagnostic criteria were confirmed by two independent expert examiners using slit-lamp examinations and topographic indices measured by Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgeräte): maximum keratometry centered on the steepest point (zonal Kmax-3 mm), Ambrósio's relational thickness (ART), inferior-superior asymmetry (IS-value), Belin/Ambrósio deviation value (BAD-D), the Tomographic and Biomechanical Index (TBI), and a posterior elevation map. In the KC cases, Corvis ST (Oculus Optikgeräte) was done. All the KC cases completed the second phase in 2017.

resultsKC was identified in 28 patients (12.39%; 95% confidence interval: 8.2-17.9%): 20 bilateral and eight unilateral cases. Of these, 24 were in the ≤ 20-years age group, and four, in the > 20-years age group. The frequency of KC was not significantly correlated with age (P = 0.804) or gender (P = 0.322). In the KC cases, the mean zonal Kmax-3 mm, ART-max, IS-value, BAD-D, CBI, and TBI were 50.40 ± 5.88 D, 321.63 ± 111.94 μm, 1.99 ± 2.51, 3.73 ± 3.12, 0.54 ± 0.61, and 0.86 ± 0.20, respectively, and the minimum corneal thickness was 492.17 ± 42.67 μm. Of the 28 patients, 39.6% showed progression, and all were in the ≤ 20-years age group.

conclusionThe prevalence of KC in Down syndrome patients is significantly higher than that reported in non-Down syndrome individuals of the same age groups. The progression rate is approximately similar to that of the non-Down syndrome population. Screening programs should be applied to prohibit serious visual impairment in these populations.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaChildCohort StudiesCorneal PachymetryCorneal TopographyDown SyndromeElasticityFemaleHumansIranKeratoconusMalePrevalenceProspective StudiesCornea biomechanicsDown syndromeKeratoconusProgressive keratoconusTomographic index

Identifiers

PMID32108918
OpenAlexW3007729228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.