Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32108914›Full record

SynthesisEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2021

Effectiveness of current psychological interventions to improve emotion regulation in youth: a meta-analysis.

Bettina Moltrecht, Jessica Deighton, Praveetha Patalay, Julian Edbrooke-Childs

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bettina MoltrechtDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, Bloomsbury, London, WC1H 0AP, UK. bettina.moltrecht.16@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1838-428X
Jessica DeightonDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, Bloomsbury, London, WC1H 0AP, UK.
Praveetha PatalayCentre for Longitudinal Studies and MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5341-3461
Julian Edbrooke-ChildsDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, Bloomsbury, London, WC1H 0AP, UK.

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 722561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch investigating the role of emotion regulation (ER) in the development and treatment of psychopathology has increased in recent years. Evidence suggests that an increased focus on ER in treatment can improve existing interventions. Most ER research has neglected young people, therefore the present meta-analysis summarizes the evidence for existing psychosocial intervention and their effectiveness to improve ER in youth. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Twenty-one randomized-control-trials (RCTs) assessed changes in ER following a psychological intervention in youth exhibiting various psychopathological symptoms. We found moderate effect sizes for current interventions to decrease emotion dysregulation in youth (g = - 0.46) and small effect sizes to improve emotion regulation (g = 0.36). Significant differences between studies including intervention components, ER measures and populations studied resulted in large heterogeneity. This is the first meta-analysis that summarizes the effectiveness for existing interventions to improve ER in youth. The results suggest that interventions can enhance ER in youth, and that these improvements correlate with improvements in psychopathology. More RCTs including larger sample sizes, different age groups and psychopathologies are needed to increase our understanding of what works for who and when.

Indexed as

AdolescentEmotional RegulationFemaleHumansMalePsychopathologyPsychosocial InterventionEmotion regulationMeta-analysisPsychological interventionPsychopathologyYouth mental health

Identifiers

PMID32108914
PMCPMC8140974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.