Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32108908›Full record

ArticleDie Naturwissenschaften2020

Cross-continental test of natal philopatry and habitat-imprinting hypotheses to explain host specificity in an obligate brood parasite.

Jaroslav Koleček, Petr Procházka, Vojtěch Brlík, Marcel Honza

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Die Naturwissenschaften, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jaroslav KolečekThe Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Květná 8, Brno, CZ-60365, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1069-6593
Petr ProcházkaThe Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Květná 8, Brno, CZ-60365, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9385-4547
Vojtěch BrlíkThe Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Květná 8, Brno, CZ-60365, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7902-8123
Marcel HonzaThe Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Květná 8, Brno, CZ-60365, Czech Republic. honza@ivb.cz.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4075-702X
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Biology · CZCharles University · CZ

Funding

Akademie Věd České Republiky RVO: 68081766Grantová Agentura České Republiky 17-12262S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the mechanisms responsible for maintenance of host-specific gentes in the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus). Some of them expect that when adult cuckoos return to lay their eggs to their natal site (natal philopatry hypothesis) or habitat in which they were reared (habitat-imprinting hypothesis), there is a higher probability of finding nests of the host species by which they were reared. Since published evidence is ambiguous, we here evaluate the natal philopatry and habitat-imprinting hypotheses using information on habitat homogeneity and cross-continental long-term ringing data. We found no evidence for the natal philopatry hypothesis-instead of returning to their natal site, juvenile cuckoos exhibited longer dispersal movements than adults, and the difference was even larger in comparison with a wide array of cuckoo host species. On the contrary, we found support for the habitat-imprinting hypothesis-juvenile cuckoos followed similar levels of natal habitat homogeneity at 5- and 25-km scale when returning to breed in the next years. Our results suggest that preference for the particular habitat structures may help cuckoos to find appropriate hosts.

Indexed as

EcosystemHost SpecificityAnimalsBirdsImprinting, PsychologicalParasitesCuckooDispersalFidelityNest siteRinging dataSpatial analysis

Identifiers

PMID32108908
OpenAlexW3008992595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.