ArticleJAMA network open2020
Assessment of Expert-Level Automated Detection of Plasmodium falciparum in Digitized Thin Blood Smear Images.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deep learning applications in visual data for benign and malignant hematologic conditions: a systematic review and visual glossary.Haematologica · 2023Pooled it
- Deep learning applications in parasite microscopy: A scoping review.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- An interactive mindmap of blood film images for automated malaria diagnosis: a comprehensive metadata repository of available datasets.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Review
- Still counting sperm? Why novel, truly informative measurements of testis function in male infertility are urgently needed.Endocrine · 2025Review
- Validation of Digital Slide Scanning and a Convolutional Neural Network for the Detection of Intestinal Parasites in Human Stool Samples.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Application of image recognition technology in pathological diagnosis of blood smears.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2024Review
- Evaluating Plasmodium falciparum automatic detection and parasitemia estimation: A comparative study on thin blood smear images.PloS one · 2024Article
- Application of Deep Learning in Clinical Settings for Detecting and Classifying Malaria Parasites in Thin Blood Smears.Open forum infectious diseases · 2023Article
- AIDMAN: An AI-based object detection system for malaria diagnosis from smartphone thin-blood-smear images.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Computer Vision and Artificial Intelligence Are Emerging Diagnostic Tools for the Clinical Microbiologist.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Decades of effort have been devoted to establishing an automated microscopic diagnosis of malaria, but there are challenges in achieving expert-level performance in real-world clinical settings because publicly available annotated data for benchmark and validation are required. Objective: To assess an expert-level malaria detection algorithm using a publicly available benchmark image data set. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this diagnostic study, clinically validated malaria image data sets, the Taiwan Images for Malaria Eradication (TIME), were created by digitizing thin blood smears acquired from patients with malaria selected from the biobank of the Taiwan Centers for Disease Control from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2018. These smear images were annotated by 4 clinical laboratory scientists who worked in medical centers in Taiwan and trained for malaria microscopic diagnosis at the national reference laboratory of the Taiwan Centers for Disease Control. With TIME, a convolutional neural network-based object detection algorithm was developed for identification of malaria-infected red blood cells. A diagnostic challenge using another independent data set within TIME was performed to compare the algorithm performance against that of human experts as clinical validation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Performance on detecting Plasmodium falciparum-infected blood cells was measured by average precision, and performance on detecting P falciparum infection at the image level was measured using sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: The TIME data sets contained 8145 images of 36 blood smears from patients with suspected malaria (30 P falciparum-positive and 6 P falciparum-negative smears) that had reliable annotations. For clinical validation, the average precision was 0.885 for detecting P falciparum-infected blood cells and 0.838 for ring form. For detecting P falciparum infection on blood smear images, the algorithm had expert-level performance (sensitivity, 0.995; specificity, 0.900; AUC, 0.997 [95% CI, 0.993-0.999]), especially in detecting ring form (sensitivity, 0.968; specificity, 0.960; AUC, 0.995 [95% CI, 0.990-0.998]) compared with experienced microscopists (mean sensitivity, 0.995 [95% CI, 0.993-0.998]; mean specificity, 0.955 [95% CI, 0.885-1.000]). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that a clinically validated expert-level malaria detection algorithm can be developed by using reliable data sets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.