Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32108865›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2020

Machine learning as a strategy to account for dietary synergy: an illustration based on dietary intake and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Lisa M Bodnar, Abigail R Cartus, Sharon I Kirkpatrick, Katherine P Himes, Edward H Kennedy, Hyagriv N Simhan, William A Grobman, Jennifer Y Duffy, Robert M Silver, Samuel Parry and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Advances in methods for characterizing dietary patterns: A scoping review.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Artificial intelligence for dementia prevention.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Lisa M BodnarDepartment of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Abigail R CartusDepartment of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Sharon I KirkpatrickSchool of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Katherine P HimesDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Edward H KennedyDepartment of Statistics & Data Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Hyagriv N SimhanDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
William A GrobmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jennifer Y DuffyDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Robert M SilverDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Samuel ParryDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ashley I NaimiDepartment of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · USCarnegie Mellon University · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Utah · USUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

Preterm Birth in Nulliparous Women: An Understudied Population at Great RiskU10HD063036 · NICHD · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI PARKER, CORETTE BREEDEN · 2010 to 2015
$19.5M
Informing national guidelines on diet patterns that promote healthy pregnancy outcomesR01HD102313 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BODNAR, LISA M, NAIMI, ASHLEY ISAAC · 2020 to 2024
$3.0M
Prevention of Preterm Birth in high Risk Nulliparous PatientsU10HD063047 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WAPNER, RONALD · 2010 to 2014
$1.9M
Preterm Birth in Nulliparous Women: An Understudied Population at Great RiskU10HD063053 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI SILVER, ROBERT M. · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
Preterm Birth in Nulliparous Women: An Understudied Population at Great Risk U10HD063020 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GROBMAN, WILLIAM ADAM · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
Preterm Birth in Nulliparous Women: An Understudied Population at Great RiskU10HD063046 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI WING, DEBORAH A · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
Preterm Birth in Nulliparous Women: An Understudied Population at Great RiskU10HD063041 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI SIMHAN, HYAGRIV N · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
Preterm Birth in Nulliparous Women: An Understudied Population at Great RiskU10HD063048 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI PARRY, SAMUEL I. · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
Dissecting the Genetic Etiology of Preterm Birth in Nulliparous WomenU10HD063037 · NICHD · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI HAAS, DAVID M. · 2010 to 2014
$1.2M
Adverse Outcomes in Nulliparous Pregnancies: The Ohio CollaborativeU10HD063072 · NICHD · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MERCER, BRIAN M. · 2010 to 2014
$1.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD102313NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD063020NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD063036NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD063037NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD063041NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD063046NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD063047NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD063048NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD063053NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD063072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConventional analytic approaches for studying diet patterns assume no dietary synergy, which can lead to bias if incorrectly modeled. Machine learning algorithms can overcome these limitations.

objectivesWe estimated associations between fruit and vegetable intake relative to total energy intake and adverse pregnancy outcomes using targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) paired with the ensemble machine learning algorithm Super Learner, and compared these with results generated from multivariable logistic regression.

methodsWe used data from 7572 women in the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: monitoring mothers-to-be. Usual daily periconceptional intake of total fruits and total vegetables was estimated from an FFQ. We calculated the marginal risk of preterm birth, small-for-gestational-age (SGA) birth, gestational diabetes, and pre-eclampsia according to density of fruits and vegetables (cups/1000 kcal) ≥80th percentile compared with <80th percentile using multivariable logistic regression and Super Learner with TMLE. Models were adjusted for confounders, including other Healthy Eating Index-2010 components.

resultsUsing logistic regression, higher fruit and high vegetable densities were associated with 1.1% and 1.4% reductions in pre-eclampsia risk compared with lower densities, respectively. They were not associated with the 3 other outcomes. Using Super Learner with TMLE, high fruit and vegetable densities were associated with fewer cases of preterm birth (-4.0; 95% CI: -4.9, -3.0 and -3.7; 95% CI: -5.0, -2.3), SGA (-1.7; 95% CI: -2.9, -0.51 and -3.8; 95% CI: -5.0, -2.5), and pre-eclampsia (-3.2; 95% CI: -4.2, -2.2 and -4.0; 95% CI: -5.2, -2.7) per 100 births, respectively, and high vegetable densities were associated with a 0.9% increase in risk of gestational diabetes.

conclusionsThe differences in results between Super Learner with TMLE and logistic regression suggest that dietary synergy, which is accounted for in machine learning, may play a role in pregnancy outcomes. This innovative methodology for analyzing dietary data has the potential to advance the study of diet patterns.

Indexed as

Pregnancy OutcomeAdultDiabetes, GestationalDietFemaleFruitHumansMachine LearningMalePre-EclampsiaPregnancyPremature BirthPrenatal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaProspective StudiesVegetablesYoung Adultbirthdietary patternsmachine learningpregnancypregnant womensynergy

Identifiers

PMID32108865
PMCPMC7266693
OpenAlexW3006865973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.