ArticleLung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society
Accidental inhalation of scarf pin: Presentation and management.
Article in Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Head Scarf Pin in the Airway and Challenges in Rigid Bronchoscopy: A Case Series.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024Article
- Role of Flexible Bronchoscopy using Biopsy Forceps as the Initial Attempt for Headscarf Pin Aspiration Extraction.The open respiratory medicine journal · 2023Article
- Endoscopic management of pin stuck into the segmental bronchus.Clinical case reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe accidental aspiration of foreign bodies (FBs) is a rare occurrence in adults. However, inhalation of scarf pin is a phenomenon more and more common in the context of Muslim nations. The aim of our study was to describe the characteristics of this particular FB and illustrate the circumstances and consequences of inhalation.
methodsThis retrospective study involved patients with a history of scarf pin aspiration admitted to the Thoracic Surgery Department of Mohammed VI University Hospital Center, Oujda, Morocco, over a period of 10 years. Their main presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome were analyzed.
resultsThe average age of the 30 cases was 18 years (13-43). No antecedent was found in all cases. The penetration syndrome was found in all cases, with a transient moment of suffocation in 19 cases (63.33%), a dry cough in 15 cases (50%), minimal hemoptysis in 4 cases (13.33%), and purulent sputum in 3 cases (10%). The clinical examination was normal in all cases. The chest X-ray showed the FB in the form of linear right sided opacity in 14 cases (46.66%), left sided in 8 cases (26.66%), and in the trachea in 8 cases (26.66). Rigid bronchoscopy visualized the scarf pin at the level of the right basal pyramid in 5 cases (16.66%) and on the left side in 2 cases (6.66%), at the level of the main right and intermediate trunk in 7 cases (23.33%), at the level of the left main bronchus in 4 cases (13.33%) and in the trachea in 5 cases (16.66%). The pin was extracted by rigid bronchoscopy in 23 cases (76.66%) and was expelled spontaneously in 5 cases (16.66%). Thoracotomy was required in 2 cases (6.66%). Medical treatment, including antibiotic therapy and short-course oral corticosteroids, was administered in all cases.
conclusionScarf pin inhalation is common in women who wear the Islamic headscarf. Bronchoscopy is an important tool to manage these FBs, but the best prevention treatment is careful handling of these potentially sharp objects away from the mouth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.