Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32108572›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

Categorical representation from sound and sight in the ventral occipito-temporal cortex of sighted and blind.

Stefania Mattioni, Mohamed Rezk, Ceren Battal, Roberto Bottini, Karen E Cuculiza Mendoza, Nikolaas N Oosterhof, Olivier Collignon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Action-type mapping principles extend beyond evolutionarily conserved actions, even in people born without hands.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Decoding semantic sound categories in early visual cortex.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Longitudinal stability of individual brain plasticity patterns in blindness.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stefania MattioniInstitute of research in Psychology (IPSY) & Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS) - University of Louvain (UCLouvain), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8279-6118
Mohamed RezkInstitute of research in Psychology (IPSY) & Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS) - University of Louvain (UCLouvain), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1866-8645
Ceren BattalInstitute of research in Psychology (IPSY) & Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS) - University of Louvain (UCLouvain), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9844-7630
Roberto BottiniCentre for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7941-7762
Karen E Cuculiza MendozaCentre for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Nikolaas N OosterhofCentre for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Olivier CollignonInstitute of research in Psychology (IPSY) & Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS) - University of Louvain (UCLouvain), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1882-3550

Funding

European Commission MADVIS: 337573Excellence of Science 30991544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Is vision necessary for the development of the categorical organization of the Ventral Occipito-Temporal Cortex (VOTC)? We used fMRI to characterize VOTC responses to eight categories presented acoustically in sighted and early blind individuals, and visually in a separate sighted group. We observed that VOTC reliably encodes sound categories in sighted and blind people using a representational structure and connectivity partially similar to the one found in vision. Sound categories were, however, more reliably encoded in the blind than the sighted group, using a representational format closer to the one found in vision. Crucially, VOTC in blind represents the categorical membership of sounds rather than their acoustic features. Our results suggest that sounds trigger categorical responses in the VOTC of congenitally blind and sighted people that partially match the topography and functional profile of the visual response, despite qualitative nuances in the categorical organization of VOTC between modalities and groups.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionAcoustic StimulationBlindnessCase-Control StudiesHumansOccipital LobeTemporal Lobeauditoryblindnesscategory perceptioncrossmodal plasticityfMRI-multivariate analyseshumanneurosciencevisual

Identifiers

PMID32108572
PMCPMC7108866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.