Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32108560›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2020

Characterization of Instructor and Student Behaviors in CURE and Non-CURE Learning Environments: Impacts on Student Motivation, Science Identity Development, and Perceptions of the Laboratory Experience.

David Esparza, Amy E Wagler, Jeffrey T Olimpo

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
24.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Interactive Notebooks Improve Students' Understanding of Developmental Neurobiology, Attitudes Toward Research, and Experimental Design Competency in a Lecture-Based Neuroscience Course.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Influence of CUREs on STEM retention depends on demographic identities.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Can We Quantify If It's a CURE?Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David EsparzaDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968.
Amy E WaglerDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968.
Jeffrey T OlimpoDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968.
The University of Texas at El Paso · US

Funding

Phase II of BUILDing SCHOLARSUL1GM118970 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS EL PASO · PI ALEY, STEPHEN B, BOLAND, THOMAS · 2015 to 2023
$17.9M
Phase II of BUILDing SCHOLARS - Student Training CoreTL4GM118971 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS EL PASO · PI ALEY, STEPHEN B, BOLAND, THOMAS · 2015 to 2023
$9.9M
Phase II of BUILDing SCHOLARS - Research Enrichment CoreRL5GM118969 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS EL PASO · PI ALEY, STEPHEN B, BOLAND, THOMAS · 2015 to 2023
$7.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS RL5 GM118969NIGMS NIH HHS TL4 GM118971NIGMS NIH HHS UL1 GM118970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) serve to increase student access to authentic scientific opportunities. Current evidence within the literature indicates that engagement in CUREs promotes students' science identity development, science self-efficacy, motivation, and ability to "think like a scientist." Despite the importance of these findings, few studies have examined the behaviors and interactions occurring within CURE and non-CURE settings and the impact of those behaviors on said student outcomes. To address these concerns, we conducted a mixed-methods study to explore student and instructor behaviors in four CURE and four non-CURE introductory biology laboratory sections. Representative video data were collected in each section and coded using the Laboratory Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM. In addition, pre/postsemester affective survey data were obtained from CURE and non-CURE participants. Results indicated that CURE students and instructors engaged in more interactive behaviors (e.g., one-on-one dialogue, questioning) than their non-CURE counterparts, a finding confirmed by analyzing behavioral patterns via construction of partial correlation networks. Multiple regression analyses further revealed that both student and instructor interactive behaviors and enrollment in a CURE were strong predictors of pre/postsemester shifts in student motivation, science identity development, collaboration, and perceived opportunities to make relevant scientific discoveries.

Indexed as

MotivationScienceEnvironmentHumansLaboratoriesLearningStudentsUniversities

Identifiers

PMID32108560
PMCPMC8697643
OpenAlexW3008198797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.