ArticleCancer medicine2020
Real-world data of lapatinib and treatment after lapatinib in patients with previously treated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: A multicenter, retrospective study.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comprehensive Molecular Docking and Molecular Dynamics Reveal Inhibitors of HER2 L755S, T798I, and T798M based on a Large Database of Curcumin Derivatives.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026Article
- Signal mining and safety profile analysis of lapatinib: a pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2026Article
- Treatment beyond progression and rechallenge with pyrotinib in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and brain metastases: a multicenter real-world study.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Article
- Development and validation of the NCC-BC-A scale to assess patient-reported outcomes for breast cancer patients in China.Cancer innovation · 2024Article
- Recent Advances in Structural Optimization of Quinazoline-Based Protein Kinase Inhibitors for Cancer Therapy (2021-Present).Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Effectiveness and safety of pyrotinib-based therapy in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: A real-world retrospective study.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
- Real-world data of lapatinib and treatment after lapatinib in patients with previously treated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: A multicenter, retrospective study.Cancer medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lapatinib is widely used in the later lines treatment of HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). EGF104900 study suggested that among patients who experienced progression on prior trastuzumab-containing regimens, lapatinib plus trastuzumab had better effects than trastuzumab alone. However, no evidence was discovered in terms of lapatinib plus capetabine compared with lapatinib plus trastuzumab plus chemotherapy, as well as a treatment after progression on lapatinib. We evaluated the medical records retrospectively of all MBC patients with HER2 positive disease who progressed on prior trastuzumab-containing regimens (advanced setting) and a taxane (any setting) and received lapatinib-based treatment from 2015 to 2018 in five institutions in China. A total of 242 patients were available for analysis. Among them, 164 (68%) patients received lapatinib plus capetabine (LX) and 78 (32%) patients received lapatinib plus trastuzumab and one chemotherapy (HLC). The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the HLC group was significantly superior to the LX group (8.8 months vs 5.0 months, P < .0000001). No significant difference in grade 3 or worse adverse events was observed in two groups (P = .57). A total of 175 patients were available for the analysis of the postlapatinib treatment. Continuation of lapatinib showed superior mPFS results compared to the non-anti-HER2 treatment (4 months vs 2 months, P = .01) and similar results compared to switch to other anti-HER2 treatments (4 months vs 4 months, P = .88). In patients who had progressed on prior trastuzumab-base therapy, HLC provided a new dual-targeting treatment option for the later lines therapy of patients with HER2 positive MBC. Moreover, evidence of cross-line use of lapatinib was provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.