ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2020
Greater knee joint laxity remains in teenagers after anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction compared to young adults.
Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Knee instability caused by altered graft mechanical properties after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the early onset of osteoarthritis?Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Minimizing the risk of graft failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in athletes. A narrative review of the current evidence.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThere is paucity in studies regarding double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (DB-ACLR) in teenagers. The purpose of this study is to investigate clinical outcome after DB-ACLR and analyze whether any differences exist between teenagers and young adults.
methodsA retrospective study was performed between 2009 and 2017. Teenagers were defined as patients between 15 and 19 years and young adults between 20 and 25 years old. Isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries with DB-ACLR with minimum two-year follow up were included. Pre and post-operative Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, KT-2000 arthrometer, manual pivot-shift grade, were assessed with post-operative one-leg hop test, isokinetic knee extensor strength test at 60°/sec, International Knee Documentation Committee Score (IKDC score), and re-injury rate.
resultsOne-hundred and thirty-one patients, 75 patients in the teenage group (Group A) and 56 patients in the young adult group (Group B), were enrolled. Lysholm score was significantly lower in Group A (89.6 ± 21.1) compared to Group B (95.9 ± 4.6) (p = 0.04). Side to side difference in KT-2000 arthrometer (2.3 ± 2.2 mm vs 1.0 ± 2.3 mm, Group A vs Group B, respectively, p < 0.01) and ratio of post-operative positive pivot shift was significantly greater in Group A (30.7%) compared to Group B (7.1%) (p < 0.01). No significant difference was seen in re-injury rate (n.s.).
conclusionTeenage patients have a greater tendency for residual knee joint laxity after DB-ACLR. Although teenagers and patients in the early twenties are close in age, characteristic in knee joint laxity may be different and, therefore, may require attention upon surgery and post-operative follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.