Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32108252›Full record

ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2020

[Second opinion in retinal imaging].

Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg, Laura Kühlewein, Sebastian M Waldstein, Georg Spital, Focke Ziemssen, Sandra Liakopoulos

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Interdisciplinary communication: ophthalmologists' letters to practices specializing in diabetic patients].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021
    Article
  2. [Value and formats of quality assurance : Ophthalmology and intravitreal therapy between reality and wishful thinking].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Steffen Schmitz-ValckenbergGRADE Reading Center, Universitäts-Augenklinik Bonn, Ernst-Abbe-Str. 2, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland. steffen.schmitz-valckenberg@ukbonn.de.
Laura KühleweinDepartment für Augenheilkunde, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Sebastian M WaldsteinChristian Doppler Laboratory for Ophthalmic Image Analysis, Univ. Klinik für Augenheilkunde und Optometrie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich.
Georg SpitalM3 Reading Center, Augenzentrum, St. Franziskus Hospital, Münster, Deutschland.
Focke ZiemssenDepartment für Augenheilkunde, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Sandra LiakopoulosCologne Image Reading Center, Zentrum für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Deutschland.
University of Tübingen · DECentrum für Integrierte Onkologie · DEOphthalmology Clinic · DESt. Franziskus Hospital · DEUniversitäts-Augenklinik Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the use of digital imaging systems and the possibilities of data exchange, the second opinion is becoming increasingly more important in retinal imaging. For a meaningful application, technical imaging requirements and medical assessment quality requirements have to be fulfilled. Responsibilities should be clearly defined. The aim must be to achieve a significant contribution to ensure high-quality patient care.

Indexed as

RetinaHumansReferral and ConsultationTelemedicineDiagnosticsQuality managementReading centerRetinal imagingTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID32108252
OpenAlexW3007048037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.