ArticleHeart and vessels2020
Meteorological and chronobiological factors and the occurrence of acute aortic dissection.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Japanese Society of Hypertension Practical Consensus Guidelines for Seasonal Blood Pressure Management.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Spatiotemporal Mortality Patterns and Temperature-Associated Risk of Aortic Dissection in the United States: A National CDC WONDER Database Analysis.Vascular health and risk management · 2026Article
- Cold exposure and the cardiovascular system: from physiological adaptation to pathological risk.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
- Patterns in acute aortic dissection and a connection to meteorological conditions in Germany.PloS one · 2024Article
- Risk assessment and disease burden of extreme precipitation on hospitalizations for acute aortic dissection in a subtropical coastal Chinese city.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Low temperature and temperature decline increase acute aortic dissection risk and burden: A nationwide case crossover analysis at hourly level among 40,270 patients.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2022Article
- Association of Daily Mean Temperature and Temperature Variability With Onset Risks of Acute Aortic Dissection.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although a number of studies have demonstrated seasonal variations in acute cardiovascular events, the association between winter and low temperatures and the incidence rate of acute aortic dissection has not been fully elucidated. In this study, we investigated the association between meteorological and chronobiological factors and the occurrence of acute aortic dissection classified by the Stanford type, sex and age. We retrospectively collected 131 patients who had been admitted consecutively to our institution with acute aortic dissection, including 58 type A patients and 73 type B patients, from January 2013 to December 2017. The meteorological data were downloaded from the homepage of the Japan Meteorological Agency. The daily incidence of aortic dissection was higher in winter (10.2%) than in fall (5.3%) (P = 0.04), and a significant winter peak was also observed in the sub-groups of males and type B, while there were no significant differences in the proportions of type A, female, and ≤ 70- and > 70-year-old patients. The maximum, mean and minimum temperatures on the days with aortic dissection were significantly lower than on the days without aortic dissection. Divided into four seasons, lower temperatures were found only in spring. The most significant and greatest difference was observed between the maximum temperature on the day of aortic dissection and that at 2 days earlier. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the difference in the maximum temperature between the day of and 2 days before the incident (odds ratio 0.91; 95% confidence interval 0.87-0.96; P < 0.01) as well as the maximum temperature (odds ratio 0.97; 95% confidence interval 0.95-0.99; P = 0.02) were significantly associated with the incidence of aortic dissection. Cold weather and a sudden decrease in temperature might trigger aortic dissection, although the influence might differ among sub-groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.