ArticleScientific reports2020
Different dynamical behaviors induced by slow excitatory feedback for type II and III excitabilities.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Excitability and Threshold Mechanism for Enhanced Neuronal Response Induced by Inhibition Preceding Excitation.Neural plasticity · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuronal excitability is classified as type I, II, or III, according to the responses of electronic activities, which play different roles. In the present paper, the effect of an excitatory autapse on type III excitability is investigated and compared to type II excitability in the Morris-Lecar model, based on Hopf bifurcation and characteristics of the nullcline. The autaptic current of a fast-decay autapse produces periodic stimulations, and that of a slow-decay autapse highly resembles sustained stimulations. Thus, both fast- and slow-decay autapses can induce a resting state for type II excitability that changes to repetitive firing. However, for type III excitability, a fast-decay autapse can induce a resting state to change to repetitive firing, while a slow-decay autapse can induce a resting state to change to a resting state following a transient spike instead of repetitive spiking, which shows the abnormal phenomenon that a stronger excitatory effect of a slow-decay autapse just induces weaker responses. Our results uncover a novel paradoxical phenomenon of the excitatory effect, and we present potential functions of fast- and slow-decay autapses that are helpful for the alteration and maintenance of type III excitability in the real nervous system related to neuropathic pain or sound localization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.