Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32108084›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2021

E-cigarette and cigarette purchasing among young adults before and after implementation of California's tobacco 21 policy.

Sara Schiff, Fei Liu, Tess Boley Cruz, Jennifer B Unger, Sam Cwalina, Adam Leventhal, Rob McConnell, Jessica Barrington-Trimis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. What is the Relationship Between Raising the Minimum Legal Sales Age of Tobacco Above 20 and Cigarette Smoking? A Systematic Review.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Assessing Nicotine Exposure in Users and Non-Users of Electronic Cigarettes Through Silicone Wristbands.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Lifecycle Management as a Roadmap to the Tobacco Endgame.World journal of clinical medicine research · 2025
    Article
  11. Reducing Commercial Tobacco Sales to Youth On and Around California Tribal Reservations With a Reward and Reminder Retail Intervention.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  12. A Qualitative Analysis of How Underage Adolescents Access Nicotine Vaping Products in Aotearoa New Zealand.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Underage E-Cigarette Purchasing and Vaping Progression Among Young Adults.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara SchiffDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9745-7952
Fei LiuDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Tess Boley CruzDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5894-1802
Jennifer B UngerDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9064-6603
Sam CwalinaDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0117-3275
Adam LeventhalDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1217-525X
Rob McConnellDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Jessica Barrington-TrimisDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA jtrimis@usc.edu.
University of Southern California · US

Funding

USC Tobacco Center of Regulatory ScienceU54CA180905 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Jennifer Beth Unger · 2018 to 2026
$39.0M
USC Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS) for Vulnerable PopulationsP50CA180905 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI PENTZ, MARY ANN, SAMET, JONATHAN M · 2013 to 2017
$20.1M
Tobacco Use Treatment Research for Vulnerable PopulationsK24DA048160 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Adam Matthew Leventhal · 2019 to 2026
$1.4M
Understanding Transitions from Vaping to Smoking Across AdolescenceK01DA042950 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BARRINGTON-TRIMIS, JESSICA LOUISE · 2017 to 2021
$1.0M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA180905NCI NIH HHS U54 CA180905NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA042950NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA048160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTobacco 21 (T21) laws, which raise the minimum legal age of sale of tobacco products to 21, have been proposed and implemented in states and cities across the USA. However, limited data are available on the effect of T21 laws on youth tobacco purchasing behaviours and access to tobacco products.

methodsParticipants in a population-based prospective cohort in southern California completed questionnaires before (n=1609, age=18-19 y) and after (n=1502, age=19-20 y) T21 was implemented in California (June 2016). We examined the prevalence of past 30-day cigarette and e-cigarette use, and among past 30-day users, purchase location of tobacco products before (pre-) versus after (post-) T21. We also examined whether, post-T21, participants were refused purchase of tobacco products due to their age, and the perceived relative ease of purchasing cigarettes and e-cigarettes (vs pre-T21).

resultsNegligible changes in cigarette and e-cigarette use were observed pre-T21 versus post-T21. At both time points, the majority of past 30-day users purchased cigarettes from gas stations and e-cigarettes from vape shops. Post-T21, the proportion of participants who reported purchasing cigarettes at gas stations decreased. Post-T21, most past 30-day cigarette or e-cigarette users were not refused purchase of cigarettes (65.4%) or e-cigarettes (82.0%) in the past 30 days, despite being under 21; half of the participants felt it was harder to purchase cigarettes (54.3%) and e-cigarettes (43.6%) post-T21.

conclusionPost-T21, few participants were refused purchase of any tobacco product, despite the illegality of such sales. Better enforcement of T21 is needed to improve the efficacy of T21 legislation.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsAdolescentAdultCaliforniaHumansProspective StudiesPublic PolicyYoung Adultaddictionelectronic nicotine delivery devicespublic policy

Identifiers

PMID32108084
PMCPMC8260105
OpenAlexW3007065496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.