ArticleBioengineered2020
Serum miR-125b levels associated with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) development and treatment responses.
Article in Bioengineered, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Assessing diagnostic accuracy of circulating microRNAs as biomarkers for ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Pooled it
- Circulating microRNAs for Early Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Biomolecules · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Role of non-coding RNA through nanomedicine: the novel therapeutic and diagnostic approaches.BioImpacts : BI · 2025Review
- Competing endogenous RNA networks in ovarian cancer: from bench to bedside.EXCLI journal · 2025Review
- Circulating microRNAs as Diagnostic Biomarkers to Detect Specific Stages of Ovarian Cancer: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2024Review
- MicroRNA Significance in Cancer: An Updated Review on Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Perspectives.EJIFCC · 2024Review
- Exploring the role of noncoding RNAs in cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and precision medicine.Non-coding RNA research · 2024Review
- Utilization of miRNAs as Biomarkers for the Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Metastasis in Gynecological Malignancies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Article
- miR-125 in Breast Cancer Etiopathogenesis: An Emerging Role as a Biomarker in Differential Diagnosis, Regenerative Medicine, and the Challenges of Personalized Medicine.Non-coding RNA · 2024Review
- Mir-21 and Mir-125b as theranostic biomarkers for epithelial ovarian cancer in Tunisian women.African health sciences · 2023Article
- The Role of Perioperative C-Reactive Protein in Predicting the Prognosis of Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma.Cancer management and research · 2023Article
- Role of serum microRNAs as biomarkers for endometriosis, endometrioid carcinoma of ovary & endometrioid endometrial cancer.The Indian journal of medical research · 2022Article
- Characterization of Epigenetic and Molecular Factors in Endometrium of Females with Infertility.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- The Profile of MicroRNA Expression and Potential Role in the Regulation of Drug-Resistant Genes in Doxorubicin and Topotecan Resistant Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Effects of adiponectin, plasma D-dimer, inflammation and tumor markers on clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with ovarian cancer.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2022Article
- Aberrant Methylation of 20 miRNA Genes Specifically Involved in Various Steps of Ovarian Carcinoma Spread: From Primary Tumors to Peritoneal Macroscopic Metastases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: From drug resistance mechanisms to liquid biopsy-based biomarkers for disease management.Seminars in cancer biology · 2021Review
- Extracellular microRNA profiling for prognostic prediction in patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma.Cancer science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Downexpression of miRs was associated with tumor development, progression, and metastasis. This study explored the serum levels of miR-125b in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and to assess its diagnostic value and monitor treatment responses for patients with EOC. A total of 379 individuals were recruited and assigned to the study groups. RT-qPCR analysis was performed to confirm the association of serum miR-125b levels with tumor stages and treatment responses. The median serum levels of miR-125b in patients with EOC were significantly lower than that of other controls (P < 0.0001). Serum miR-125b in patients with high FIGO stage (III+IV), lymph node metastasis, and chemoresistance were lower than that in patients with early-stage (stage I+ II; P < 0.001), without lymph metastasis (p = 0.032) and chemosensitivity (P < 0.001). Low levels of miR-125b had a poor prognosis in patients with EOC. Using a median value of 0.748 to separate EOC from other controls, the sensitivity and specificity reached 0.76 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.85) and 0.416 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.55), respectively. Serum miR-125b showed a statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative patients in surgical patient groups (P = 0.003). Serum miR-125b levels were lower in patients with chemoresistance than that in patients with chemosensitivity (P < 0.0001). Serum miR-125b in combination with serum CA125 improved both sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis of EOC (P < 0.001). This study demonstrated that serum miR-125b levels were a useful diagnostic biomarker and biomarker to predict the responses to chemotherapy in patients with EOC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.