Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32107761›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2020

Gestational Diabetes in the Population Served by Brazilian Public Health Care. Prevalence and Risk Factors.

Pâmela Antoniazzi Dos Santos, José Mauro Madi, Emerson Rodrigues da Silva, Daiane de Oliveira Pereira Vergani, Breno Fauth de Araújo, Rosa Maria Rahmi Garcia

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pâmela Antoniazzi Dos SantosHealth Sciences Postgraduate Program, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1197-8739
José Mauro MadiHealth Sciences Postgraduate Program, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2345-4713
Emerson Rodrigues da SilvaHealth Sciences Postgraduate Program, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3414-0592
Daiane de Oliveira Pereira VerganiHealth Sciences Postgraduate Program, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2510-1740
Breno Fauth de AraújoHealth Sciences Postgraduate Program, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2288-0032
Rosa Maria Rahmi GarciaHealth Sciences Postgraduate Program, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1547-6282
Universidade de Caxias do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus and the main associated risk factors in the population served by the Brazilian Unified Health System in the city of Caxias do Sul, state of Rio Grande do Sul. MATERIALS AND

methodsA descriptive, cross-sectional and retrospective study was conducted. Maternal variables were collected from the medical records of all pregnant women treated at the basic health units in 2016. Hyperglycemia during pregnancy (pregestational diabetes, overt diabetes and gestational diabetes mellitus) was identified by analyzing the results of a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test, as recommended by the Brazilian Ministry of Health. Based on the data, the women were allocated into two groups: the gestational diabetes group and the no gestational diabetes group.

resultsThe estimated prevalence of gestational diabetes among 2,313 pregnant women was of 5.4% (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 4.56-6.45). Pregnant women with 3 or more pregnancies had twice the odds of having gestational diabetes compared with primiparous women (odds ratio [OR] = 2.19; 95%CI: 1.42-3.37;

conclusionIn this population, the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus was of 5.4%. Age and being overweight were predictive factors for gestational diabetes.

Indexed as

Prenatal CareAdultAge FactorsBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes, GestationalFemaleGlucose Tolerance TestHumansMedical RecordsOverweightPregnancyPrevalencePublic HealthRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID32107761
PMCPMC10316875
OpenAlexW3006880560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.