Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32107706›Full record

SynthesisObesity surgery2020

Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty at Mid Term in the Management of Overweight and Obese Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Antonio Afonso de Miranda Neto, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Igor Braga Ribeiro, Ahmad Khan, Shailendra Singh, Alberto Machado da Ponte Neto, Antonio Coutinho Madruga Neto, Epifanio Silvino do Monte Junior, Francisco Tustumi, Wanderley Marques Bernardo and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Polish Expert Consensus on Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: 2025 update.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025
    Article
  17. Observational
  18. Preliminary validation of the virtual bariatric endoscopic simulator.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2024
    Article
  19. Editorial: Potentials and Pitfalls in Targeting Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) in the Management of Increasing Levels of Obesity.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Antonio Afonso de Miranda NetoGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.
Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de MouraGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.
Igor Braga RibeiroGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil. igorbraga1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1844-8973
Ahmad KhanDepartment of Medicine, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center Charleston Division, Charleston, WV, USA.
Shailendra SinghDivision of Gastroenterology, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center Charleston Division, Charleston, WV, USA.
Alberto Machado da Ponte NetoGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.
Antonio Coutinho Madruga NetoGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.
Epifanio Silvino do Monte JuniorGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.
Francisco TustumiGastroenterology Unit, Hospital das Clínicas, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.
Wanderley Marques BernardoGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de MouraGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRWest Virginia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) has emerged as a promising technique in endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs). We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide an update on its efficacy and safety.

methodsThis is a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE, and LILACS were searched to identify the studies related to ESG.

resultsEleven studies with a total of 2170 patients were included. The average BMI pre-ESG was 35.78 kg/m

conclusionESG is a safe and effective procedure for primary obesity therapy with promising short- and mid-term results.

Indexed as

GastroplastyObesity, MorbidHumansObesityTreatment OutcomeWeight LossBariatricEndoscopyESGGastroplastyObesityOverweightSleeveSurgery

Identifiers

PMID32107706
OpenAlexW3008762061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.