Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32107702›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2020

Assessing the accuracy of octanol-water partition coefficient predictions in the SAMPL6 Part II log P Challenge.

Mehtap Işık, Teresa Danielle Bergazin, Thomas Fox, Andrea Rizzi, John D Chodera, David L Mobley

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Automated high throughput pKJournal of computer-aided molecular design · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Assigning confidence to molecular property prediction.Expert opinion on drug discovery · 2021
    Article
  20. Stacking Gaussian processes to improveJournal of computer-aided molecular design · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mehtap IşıkComputational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA. mehtap.isik@choderalab.org.ORCID 0000-0002-6789-952X
Teresa Danielle BergazinDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0573-6178
Thomas FoxComputational Chemistry, Medicinal Chemistry, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co KG, 88397, Biberach, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1054-4701
Andrea RizziComputational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7693-2013
John D ChoderaComputational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0542-119X
David L MobleyDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1083-5533
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USBoehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DE

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Computational alchemy for molecular design and optimizationR01GM108889 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI MOBLEY, DAVID LOWELL · 2014 to 2022
$2.5M
Advancing predictive physical modeling through focused development of model systems to drive new modeling innovationsR01GM124270 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI MOBLEY, DAVID LOWELL · 2018 to 2021
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108889NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The SAMPL Challenges aim to focus the biomolecular and physical modeling community on issues that limit the accuracy of predictive modeling of protein-ligand binding for rational drug design. In the SAMPL5 log D Challenge, designed to benchmark the accuracy of methods for predicting drug-like small molecule transfer free energies from aqueous to nonpolar phases, participants found it difficult to make accurate predictions due to the complexity of protonation state issues. In the SAMPL6 log P Challenge, we asked participants to make blind predictions of the octanol-water partition coefficients of neutral species of 11 compounds and assessed how well these methods performed absent the complication of protonation state effects. This challenge builds on the SAMPL6 p[Formula: see text] Challenge, which asked participants to predict p[Formula: see text] values of a superset of the compounds considered in this log P challenge. Blind prediction sets of 91 prediction methods were collected from 27 research groups, spanning a variety of quantum mechanics (QM) or molecular mechanics (MM)-based physical methods, knowledge-based empirical methods, and mixed approaches. There was a 50% increase in the number of participating groups and a 20% increase in the number of submissions compared to the SAMPL5 log D Challenge. Overall, the accuracy of octanol-water log P predictions in SAMPL6 Challenge was higher than cyclohexane-water log D predictions in SAMPL5, likely because modeling only the neutral species was necessary for log P and several categories of method benefited from the vast amounts of experimental octanol-water log P data. There were many highly accurate methods: 10 diverse methods achieved RMSE less than 0.5 log P units. These included QM-based methods, empirical methods, and mixed methods with physical modeling supported with empirical corrections. A comparison of physical modeling methods showed that QM-based methods outperformed MM-based methods. The average RMSE of the most accurate five MM-based, QM-based, empirical, and mixed approach methods based on RMSE were 0.92 ± 0.13, 0.48 ± 0.06, 0.47 ± 0.05, and 0.50 ± 0.06, respectively.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalCyclohexanesMolecular Dynamics SimulationMolecular StructureOctanolsQuantum TheorySolubilitySolventsThermodynamicsWaterCyclohexaneCyclohexanesOctanolsSolventsWaterBlind prediction challengeFree energy calculationslog POctanol–water partition coefficientSAMPLSolvation modeling

Identifiers

PMID32107702
PMCPMC7138020
OpenAlexW3008775157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.