Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32107697›Full record

ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2020

Non-target toxicity of nine agrochemicals toward larvae and adults of two generalist predators active in peach orchards.

Franciele Silva De Armas, Anderson Dionei Grutzmacher, Dori Edson Nava, Rafael Antonio Pasini, Matheus Rakes, Juliano de Bastos Pazini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Franciele Silva De ArmasDepartment of Crop Protection, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPel), Postal Code 354, Capão do Leão, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul State, 96010-900, Brazil. frandearmas@gmail.com.
Anderson Dionei GrutzmacherDepartment of Crop Protection, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPel), Postal Code 354, Capão do Leão, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul State, 96010-900, Brazil.
Dori Edson NavaEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa), Embrapa Clima Temperado (Temperate Climate Embrapa), Postal code 403, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul State, 96001-970, Brazil.
Rafael Antonio PasiniCentro de Ensino Superior Riograndense, Postal Code 99560-000, Sarandi, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil.
Matheus RakesDepartment of Crop Protection, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPel), Postal Code 354, Capão do Leão, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul State, 96010-900, Brazil.
Juliano de Bastos PaziniDepartment of Crop Protection, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPel), Postal Code 354, Capão do Leão, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul State, 96010-900, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chrysoperla externa and Coleomegilla quadrifasciata are important biological control agents in peach orchards. However, orchard management with these predatory insects is viable only by using selective agrochemicals. The objective of this study is to evaluate the toxicity of nine agrochemicals used in peach orchards in larval and adult stages of the C. externa and C. quadrifasciata in laboratory conditions. The bioassays followed the methodologies proposed by the International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control (IOBC). Larvae and adults of C. externa and C. quadrifasciata were exposed to the dry residues of these products. Lethal and sublethal effects were evaluated in bioassays with the larval and adult stages of both predators. The agrochemicals were classified according to the IOBC guidelines. The insecticide chlorantraniliprole was harmless (class 1) to the larval stage of C. externa and C. quadrifasciata. Azadirachtin, copper 25% + calcium 10%, and deltamethrin were harmless to the adult stage of both insect species. The organophosphates fenitrothion and malathion were harmful (class 4) to both species in the larval and adult stages and should not be used in peach orchards. Therefore, this study demonstrates the importance of toxicity and the lethal and sublethal effects of these agrochemicals to better determine their compatibility with IPM in peach production.

Indexed as

Biological Control AgentsPrunus persicaAgricultureAgrochemicalsAnimalsColeopteraInsectaInsecticidesLarvaLimoninsMalathionNitrilesortho-AminobenzoatesPyrethrinsAgrochemicalsazadirachtinBiological Control AgentschlorantranilipoledecamethrinInsecticidesLimoninsMalathionNitrilesortho-AminobenzoatesPyrethrinsBiological controlChemical controlChrysoperla externaColeomegilla quadrifasciataNatural enemy

Identifiers

PMID32107697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.