Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32107592›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2020

Mesh Repair in Crohn's Disease: A Case-Matched Multicenter Study in 234 Patients.

Laura Beyer-Berjot, David Moszkowicz, Valérie Bridoux, Lucil Schneider, Luca Theuil, Yves François, Solafah Abdalla, Eddy Cotte, Léon Maggiori, Antoine Brouquet and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Parastomal hernia in the difficult patient: is Tophat plasty the solution?Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Laura Beyer-BerjotDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille Univ, Chemin des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France. laura.beyer@ap-hm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6594-6935
David MoszkowiczDepartment of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, UVSQ/Université Paris Saclay, 9 Avenue Charles de Gaulle, 92100, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Valérie BridouxDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Charles-Nicolle, CHU de Rouen, 1 rue de Germont, 76000, Rouen, France.
Lucil SchneiderDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Claude Huriez, CHRU de Lille, rue Michel Polonowski, 59037, Lille, France.
Luca TheuilDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Saint Eloi, CHU de Montpellier, 80 Avenue Augustin Fliche, 34000, Montpellier, France.
Yves FrançoisDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, 165 chemin du grand Revoyet, 69495, Pierre Bénite, France.
Solafah AbdallaDepartment of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, Hôpital Bicêtre, APHP, Université Paris Sud, 78 Rue du Général Leclerc, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Eddy CotteDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, 165 chemin du grand Revoyet, 69495, Pierre Bénite, France.
Léon MaggioriDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Hôpital Beaujon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris VII Diderot, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110, Clichy, France.
Antoine BrouquetDepartment of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, Hôpital Bicêtre, APHP, Université Paris Sud, 78 Rue du Général Leclerc, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
François-Régis SoucheDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Saint Eloi, CHU de Montpellier, 80 Avenue Augustin Fliche, 34000, Montpellier, France.
Philippe ZerbibDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Claude Huriez, CHRU de Lille, rue Michel Polonowski, 59037, Lille, France.
Jean-Jacques TuechDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Charles-Nicolle, CHU de Rouen, 1 rue de Germont, 76000, Rouen, France.
Yves PanisDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Hôpital Beaujon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris VII Diderot, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110, Clichy, France.
Stéphane BerdahDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille Univ, Chemin des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France.
GETAID Chirurgie Group
Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRHôpital Charles-Nicolle · FRHôpital Saint Eloi · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversité Paris-Sud · FRUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are no specific guidelines for ventral hernia management in Crohn's disease (CD) patients. We aimed to assess the risk of septic morbidity after mesh repair in CD.

methodsThis was a retrospective multicentre study comparing CD and non-CD patients undergoing mesh repair for ventral hernia (primary or incisional hernia). Controls were matched 1:1 for the presence of a stoma, history of surgical sepsis, hernia size and Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) score. All demographic, pre-, intra- and postoperative data were retrieved, including long-term data.

resultsWe included 234 patients, with 114 CD patients. Both groups had comparable VHWG scores (p = 0.12), hernia sizes (p = 0.11), ASA scores ≥ 3 (p = 0.70), body mass index values (p = 0.14), presence of stoma (CD 21.9% vs. controls 15%, p = 0.16), history of sepsis (14% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.23), rates of malnutrition (4.4% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.46), rates of incisional hernia (93% vs. 95%, p = 0.68) and concomitant procedures (18.4% vs. 11.7%, p = 0.12). CD patients carried a higher risk of postoperative septic morbidity (18.4% vs. 5%, p = 0.001), entero-prosthetic fistula (7% vs. 0, p < 0.01) and mesh withdrawals (5.3% vs. 0, p = 0.011). Ventral hernia recurrence rates were similar (14% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.15). In the univariate analysis, the risk factors for septic morbidity were CD (p = 0.001), malnutrition (p = 0.004), use of biological mesh (p < 0.0001) and concomitant procedure (p = 0.004). The mesh position, the means used for mesh fixation as well as the presence of a stoma were not identified as risk factors.

conclusionsCD seems to be a risk factor for septic morbidity after mesh repair.

Indexed as

Postoperative ComplicationsSurgical MeshAdolescentAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesCrohn DiseaseFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyHumansIncisional HerniaMaleMatched-Pair AnalysisMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID32107592
OpenAlexW3007384324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.