Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32107416›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

A phylogenetic comparative analysis on the evolution of sequential hermaphroditism in seabreams (Teleostei: Sparidae).

Susanna Pla, Chiara Benvenuto, Isabella Capellini, Francesc Piferrer

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Epigenetic mechanisms in sex determination and in the evolutionary transitions between sexual systems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  4. Environmental Cues and Mechanisms Underpinning Sex Change in Fish.Sexual development : genetics, molecular biology, evolution, endocrinology, embryology, and pathology of sex determination and differentiation · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Susanna PlaInstitut de Ciències del Mar, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5354-7032
Chiara BenvenutoEcosystems and Environment Research Centre, School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, Salford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8378-8168
Isabella CapelliniSchool of Biological Sciences, Queen's University of Belfast, 19 Chlorine Gardens, Belfast, BT9 5DL, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8065-2436
Francesc PiferrerInstitut de Ciències del Mar, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Barcelona, Spain. piferrer@icm.csic.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0903-4736
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESQueen's University Belfast · GBUniversity of Salford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Sparids are an ideal group of fishes in which to study the evolution of sexual systems since they exhibit a great sexual diversity, from gonochorism (separate sexes) to protandrous (male-first) and protogynous (female-first) sequential hermaphroditism (sex change). According to the size-advantage model (SAM), selection should favour sex change when the second sex achieves greater reproductive success at a larger body size than the first sex. Using phylogenetic comparative methods and a sample of 68 sparid species, we show that protogyny and protandry evolve from gonochorism but evolutionary transitions between these two forms of sequential hermaphroditism are unlikely to happen. Using male gonadosomatic index (GSI) as a measure of investment in gametes and proxy for sperm competition, we find that, while gonochoristic and protogynous species support the predictions of SAM, protandrous species do not, as they exhibit higher GSI values than expected even after considering mating systems and spawning modes. We suggest that small males of protandrous species have to invest disproportionally more in sperm production than predicted not only when spawning in aggregations, with high levels of sperm competition, but also when spawning in pairs due to the need to fertilize highly fecund females, much larger than themselves. We propose that this compensatory mechanism, together with Bateman's principles in sequential hermaphrodites, should be formally incorporated in the SAM.

Indexed as

Sex Determination ProcessesAnimalsBiological EvolutionBody SizeFemaleMaleModels, BiologicalPhylogenyReproductionSea BreamSpermatogenesisSpermatozoa

Identifiers

PMID32107416
PMCPMC7046777
OpenAlexW3004978191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.