Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32107249›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2020

Revitalising audit and feedback to improve patient care.

Robbie Foy, Mirek Skrypak, Sarah Alderson, Noah Michael Ivers, Bren McInerney, Jill Stoddart, Jane Ingham, Danny Keenan

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. A Systematic Review of Electronic Medical Record Driven Quality Measurement and Feedback Systems.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Systematic review and narrative synthesis of computerized audit and feedback systems in healthcare.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Observational
  14. Clinical Audit: Improving Clinical Performance for Patient Safety.Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Robbie FoyLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, UK.
Mirek SkrypakHealthcare Quality Improvement Partnership, London, UK mirek.skrypak@hqip.org.uk.
Sarah AldersonLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, UK.
Noah Michael IversWomen's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Bren McInerneyGloucerstershire, UK.
Jill StoddartHealthcare Quality Improvement Partnership, London, UK.
Jane InghamHealthcare Quality Improvement Partnership, London, UK.
Danny KeenanHealthcare Quality Improvement Partnership, London, UK.

Funding

Department of Health 16/04/13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Medical AuditQuality ImprovementHumansPatient-Centered Care

Identifiers

PMID32107249
PMCPMC7190377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.