Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32107012›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of surgery2020

Training with cognitive load improves performance under similar conditions in a real surgical task.

Ganesh Sankaranarayanan, Coleman A Odlozil, Katerina O Wells, Steven G Leeds, Sanket Chauhan, James W Fleshman, Daniel B Jones, Suvranu De

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ganesh SankaranarayananDepartment of Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA. Electronic address: ganesh.sankaranarayanan@bswhealth.org.
Coleman A OdlozilDepartment of Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.
Katerina O WellsDepartment of Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.
Steven G LeedsDepartment of Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.
Sanket ChauhanDepartment of Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.
James W FleshmanDepartment of Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.
Daniel B JonesBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Suvranu DeCenter for Modeling, Simulation, and Imaging in Medicine, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, USA.
Baylor University Medical Center · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USRensselaer Polytechnic Institute · US

Funding

Physically Realistic Virtual SurgeryR01EB005807 · NIBIB · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI DE, SUVRANU, JACKSON, CULLEN DAVIS · 2006 to 2024
$7.0M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB005807
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnhancing cognitive load while performing a bimanual surgical task affects performance. Whether repeated training under this condition could benefit performance in an operating room was tested using a virtual reality simulator with cognitive load applied through two-digit math multiplication questions.

method11 subjects were randomized to Control, VR and VR + CL groups. After a pre-test, VR and VR + CL groups repeated the peg transfer task 150 times over 15 sessions with cognitive load applied only for the last 100 trials. After training, all groups took a post-test and two weeks later the retention test with and without cognitive load and the transfer task on a pig intestine of 150 cm long under cognitive load. RESULTS AND

conclusionMixed ANOVA analysis showed significant differences between the control and VR and VR + CL groups (p = 0.013, p = 0.009) but no differences between the VR + CL and the VR groups (p = 1.0). GOALS bimanual dexterity score on transfer test show that VR + CL group outperformed both Control and VR groups (p = 0.016, p = 0.03). Training under cognitive load benefitted performance on an actual surgical task under similar conditions.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCognitionVirtual RealityAnimalsEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleSimulation TrainingTask Performance and AnalysisVideo RecordingYoung AdultCognitive loadLaparoscopySurgical educationVirtual reality simulation

Identifiers

PMID32107012
PMCPMC8054609
OpenAlexW3005128048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.