SynthesisSystematic reviews2020
Benefits and harms of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines: systematic review with meta-analyses of trial data from clinical study reports.
Synthesis in Systematic reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for the prevention of cervical cancer and other HPV-related diseases: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programmes on community rates of HPV-related disease and harms from vaccination.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Uptake and determinants of HPV vaccination in South Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- EMA's mishandling of an investigation into suspected serious neurological harms of HPV vaccines.BMJ evidence-based medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Comparison between the safety of the HPV vaccine versus placebo: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Jornal de pediatriaPooled it
- Framing of national HPV vaccine recommendations and willingness to recommend at ages 9-10.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023Trial
- Article
- Antipsychotics for Parkinson's disease: a protocol for a systematic review with network meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Liberal Versus Restrictive Oxygenation Targets in Acute Heart Failure-A Protocol for a Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Development of an innovative approach for early diagnosis of cervical cancer using TCR‑like antibodies targeting HPV18 E6 and E7 peptides.Molecular medicine reports · 2025Article
- Molecular Insights into HPV-Driven Cervical Cancer: Oncoproteins, Immune Evasion, and Epigenetic Modifications.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Adverse effects with tirzepatide: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Article
- Adverse effects with semaglutide: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.BMJ open · 2024Article
- The Role of Scientific Research in Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Discussions on Twitter: Social Network Analysis.JMIR infodemiology · 2024Article
- A reactogenic "placebo" and the ethics of informed consent in Gardasil HPV vaccine clinical trials: A case study from Denmark.The International journal of risk & safety in medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Association between human papillomavirus vaccination and serious adverse events in South Korean adolescent girls: nationwide cohort study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2021Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the benefits and harms of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines. DATA SOURCES: Clinical study reports obtained from the European Medicines Agency and GlaxoSmithKline from 2014 to 2017. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised trials that compared an HPV vaccine with a placebo or active comparator in healthy participants of all ages. APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS: Two researchers extracted data and judged risk of bias with the Cochrane tool (version 2011). Risk ratio (RR) estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. OUTCOMES: Clinically relevant outcomes in intention to treat populations-including HPV-related cancer precursors irrespective of involved HPV types, treatment procedures and serious and general harms.
resultsTwenty-four of 50 eligible clinical study reports were obtained with 58,412 pages of 22 trials and 2 follow-up studies including 95,670 participants: 79,102 females and 16,568 males age 8-72; 393,194 person-years; and 49 months mean weighted follow-up. We judged all 24 studies to be at high risk of bias. Serious harms were incompletely reported for 72% of participants (68,610/95,670). Nearly all control participants received active comparators (48,289/48,595, 99%). No clinical study report included complete case report forms. At 4 years follow-up, the HPV vaccines reduced HPV-related carcinoma in situ (367 in the HPV vaccine group vs. 490 in the comparator group, RR 0.73 [95% confidence interval, CI, 0.53 to 1.00], number needed to vaccinate [NNV] 387, P = 0.05, I
conclusionAt 4 years follow-up, the HPV vaccines decreased HPV-related cancer precursors and treatment procedures but increased serious nervous system disorders (exploratory analysis) and general harms. As the included trials were primarily designed to assess benefits and were not adequately designed to assess harms, the extent to which the HPV vaccines' benefits outweigh their harms is unclear. Limited access to clinical study reports and trial data with case report forms prevented a thorough assessment. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: CRD42017056093. Our systematic review protocol was registered on PROSPERO in January 2017: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPEROFILES/56093_PROTOCOL_20170030.pdf. Two protocol amendments were registered on PROSPERO on November 2017: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPEROFILES/56093_PROTOCOL_20171116.pdf. Our index of the HPV vaccine studies was published in Systematic Reviews in January 2018: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0675-z. A description of the challenges obtaining the data was published in September 2018: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k3694.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.