Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32106823›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2020

Cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Spanish fear-avoidance components scale and clinical implications in primary care.

Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas, Randy Neblett, Robert J Gatchel, Cristina Roldán-Jiménez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Validation of pain catastrophizing scale on breast cancer survivor.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Antonio I Cuesta-VargasDepartment of Physiotherapy of the Faculty of Health Science at the University of Malaga, Cátedra de Fisioterapia, Universidad de Málaga, Andalucía Tech, Av/ Arquitecto Peñalosa, 3 (Teatinos Campus Expansión), Malaga, 29071, Spain. acuesta@uma.es.ORCID 0000-0002-8880-4315
Randy NeblettPRIDE Research Foundation, Dallas, TX, USA.
Robert J GatchelDepartment of Psychology, Center of Excellence for the Study of Health & Chronic Illnesses, College of Science, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA.
Cristina Roldán-JiménezDepartment of Physiotherapy of the Faculty of Health Science at the University of Malaga, Cátedra de Fisioterapia, Universidad de Málaga, Andalucía Tech, Av/ Arquitecto Peñalosa, 3 (Teatinos Campus Expansión), Malaga, 29071, Spain.
Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga · ESProductive Rehabilitation Institute of Dallas for Ergonomics · USQueensland University of Technology · AUThe University of Texas at Arlington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain-related fear-avoidance (FA) is a common problem affecting many patients with painful medical conditions. As there is great interest in the clinical importance of the relationship between FA and disability, several questionnaires have been developed to measure FA. The Fear-Avoidance Components Scale (FACS) is a recently developed patient-reported instrument that addresses critical issues not previously considered in previous FA-related questionnaires. The original English version of the FACS demonstrated good reliability, internal consistency, and construct, criterion, and predictive validity. Two factors were determined: General Fear Avoidance and Types of Activities That are Avoided. The aim of this study was to to translate the FACS into European-style Spanish (FACS-Sp), and validate its psychometric properties.

methodsThis two-stage psychometric study included 330 subjects with various chronic musculoskeletal pain disorders. An initial translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the FACS, from English to Spanish, was performed. Then, critical psychometric properties were analysed, including internal consistency by Cronbach's α coefficients, structural validity from the Maximum Likelihood Extraction (MLE), and convergent validity by Pearson correlation with the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI).

resultsThis study reports for the first time the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the FACS. Total scores ranged from 0 to 88 points, with a mean of 30.49 (±17.18). The FACS-Sp showed a high internal consistency for factor 1 (α = 0.902) and factor 2 (α = 0.88). Factor structure was two-dimensional and supported structural validity, accounting for 48.75% of the total variance. Convergent validity analysis found a significant Pearson correlation r = 0.414.

conclusionThis study reports for the first time the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the FACS-Sp. Psychometric properties supported the validation of FACS-Sp and ensured the conceptual equivalence with the original English version. In primary care and chronic pain rehabilitation, FA assessment is crucial for clinical decision-making and treatment guidance. The FACS-Sp offers a new measure of FA in Spanish speaking populations. Future research on the FACS-Sp should evaluate test-retest reliability, treatment responsiveness and psychometric comparisons with other translated versions.

Indexed as

Avoidance LearningMusculoskeletal PainChronic DiseaseCross-Cultural ComparisonCross-Sectional StudiesFearFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Health QuestionnairePrimary Health CarePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSpainTranslationsChronic musculoskeletal pain disorders, patient health questionnaire, decision makingFACSFear-avoidanceThe fear-avoidance components scale

Identifiers

PMID32106823
PMCPMC7047382
OpenAlexW3011482581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.