Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32106733›Full record

Trial reportActa orthopaedica2020

Greater early migration of a short-stem total hip arthroplasty is not associated with an increased risk of osseointegration failure: 5th-year results from a prospective RSA study with 39 patients, a follow-up study.

Thilo Floerkemeier, Stefan Budde, Gabriela V Lewinski, Henning Windhagen, Christof HurSchler, Michael Schwarze

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta orthopaedica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Finite element analysis of stem migration after total hip replacement.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Hip prosthetic loosening: A very personal review.World journal of orthopedics · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thilo FloerkemeierDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Germany;
Stefan BuddeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Germany;
Gabriela V LewinskiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Germany;
Henning WindhagenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Germany;
Christof HurSchlerLaboratory for Biomechanics and Biomaterials, Hannover Medical School.
Michael SchwarzeLaboratory for Biomechanics and Biomaterials, Hannover Medical School.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose - Short-stem hip arthroplasty has been a viable alternative to standard stems for the treatment of hip osteoarthritis for over 10 years. This study assessed whether a correlation existed between a greater initial increase in implant migration and inferior clinical outcomes at 5 years postoperatively. Results on these patients after 2 years have been published previously.Patients and methods - Radiostereometry and clinical scoring were undertaken after surgery and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, and 5 years postoperatively. The migration and the clinical outcomes data from the patients with initial migrations at 3 months above the 75th percentile (≥ 75% group) were compared with those with migrations at 3 months of less than the 75th percentile (< 75% group).Results - Between 3 months and 5 years after surgery, the mean resultant implant migrations were 0.40 mm (SD 0.32) in the ≥ 75% group and 0.39 mm (SD 0.25) in the < 75% group. The mean Harris Hip Scores and SF-36 physical scores at 5 years postoperatively were 100 (SD 0.4) and 44 (SD 12), respectively, for the ≥ 75% group and 99 (SD 2) and 50 (SD 10), respectively, for the < 75% group. The differences between the patient groups were not statistically significant.Interpretation - There was no correlation between a greater initial migration and inferior clinical outcomes at 5 years postoperatively. Despite a greater initial migration, there were no risks of early aseptic loosening and inferior midterm clinical outcomes associated with a short-stem implant with a primary metaphyseal anchorage.

Indexed as

Prosthesis FailureRadiostereometric AnalysisAdultAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, HipBone-Anchored ProsthesisFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsseointegrationProspective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID32106733
PMCPMC8023937
OpenAlexW3007835685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.