Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32106587›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Identification of ε-Poly-L-lysine as an Antimicrobial Product from an

Enkhee Purev, Tatsuhiko Kondo, Daigo Takemoto, Jennifer T Niones, Makoto Ojika

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Draft genome sequences ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Molecular Phylogenetic and Comparative Genomic Analysis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Endophytic BacteriumMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Microorganisms · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Enkhee PurevDepartment of Applied Biosciences, Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.
Tatsuhiko KondoDepartment of Applied Biosciences, Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.
Daigo TakemotoDepartment of Plant Production Sciences, Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.
Jennifer T NionesDepartment of Plant Production Sciences, Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.
Makoto OjikaDepartment of Applied Biosciences, Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6671-8598
Nagoya University · JPPhilippine Rice Research Institute · PH

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 16KT0145Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology 18H04612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The endophytic fungus

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsAscomycotaEndophytesEpichloeGene Expression Regulation, FungalLigasesPhytophthoraPolylysineSpores, FungalStreptomycesAntifungal AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsLigasesPolylysineendophyteEpichloëfungicidetranscription factorε-polylysine

Identifiers

PMID32106587
PMCPMC7179176
OpenAlexW3008202828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.