Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32106440›Full record

ReviewBiosensors2020

Food Sensing: Detection of

Jasmina Vidic, Carole Chaix, Marisa Manzano, Marc Heyndrickx

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biosensors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. In Situ Electrochemical Monitoring ofChemical & biomedical imaging · 2026
    Article
  2. Expression of theApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Establishing a Rapid Enrichment Medium forFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Assessment of the risk associated withFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Open AccessFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. High-Pressure Inactivation ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jasmina VidicINRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Carole ChaixInstitut des Sciences Analytiques, UMR 5280 CNRS, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, F-69100 Villeurbanne, France.
Marisa ManzanoDipartimento di Scienze AgroAlimentari, Ambientali e Animali, via Sondrio 2/A, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3543-6141
Marc HeyndrickxFlanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Brusselsesteenweg 370, B-9090 Melle, Belgium.
AgroParisTech · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRVlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Milk is a source of essential nutrients for infants and adults, and its production has increased worldwide over the past years. Despite developments in the dairy industry, premature spoilage of milk due to the contamination by

Indexed as

AnimalsBacillus cereusDairyingFood MicrobiologyMilkSpores, BacterialBacillus cereusbiosensorsdetectionmilkspores

Identifiers

PMID32106440
PMCPMC7146628
OpenAlexW3008861258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.