Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32106392›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2020

Leg Dominance Effects on Postural Control When Performing Challenging Balance Exercises.

Arunee Promsri, Thomas Haid, Inge Werner, Peter Federolf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arunee PromsriDepartment of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck 6020, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0389-6645
Thomas HaidDepartment of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck 6020, Austria.
Inge WernerDepartment of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck 6020, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8478-8565
Peter FederolfDepartment of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck 6020, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0266-6813

Funding

University of Phayao 28082015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leg dominance reflects the preferential use of one leg over another and is typically attributed to asymmetries in the neural circuitry. Detecting leg dominance effects on motor behavior, particularly during balancing exercises, has proven difficult. The current study applied a principal component analysis (PCA) on kinematic data, to assess bilateral asymmetry on the coordinative structure (hypothesis H1) or on the control characteristics of specific movement components (hypothesis H2). Marker-based motion tracking was performed on 26 healthy adults (aged 25.3 ± 4.1 years), who stood unipedally on a multiaxial unstable board, in a randomized order, on their dominant and non-dominant leg. Leg dominance was defined as the kicking leg. PCA was performed to determine patterns of correlated segment movements ("principal movements" PM

Indexed as

balance boarddiagonal movementleg dominanceminimal intervention principlemotor controlmovement strategyone-leg stanceoptimal feedback control theoryprincipal component analysis (PCA)principal movementsex difference

Identifiers

PMID32106392
PMCPMC7139434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.