Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32106352›Full record

ArticleProteomics2020

Extending Comet for Global Amino Acid Variant and Post-Translational Modification Analysis Using the PSI Extended FASTA Format.

Jimmy K Eng, Eric W Deutsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jimmy K EngProteomics Resource, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6352-6737
Eric W DeutschInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.

Funding

Systems BiologyU19AG023122 · NIA · TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INST · PI JODI A LAPIDUS · 2004 to 2026
$102.6M
Shortening the development cycle time of Trans Proteomic Pipeline tools with high performance computingR01GM087221 · NIGMS · INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY · PI DEUTSCH, ERIC, MORITZ, ROBERT L · 2010 to 2021
$6.0M
Advancing data and metadata standards for proteomics mass spectraR24GM127667 · NIGMS · INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY · PI DEUTSCH, ERIC · 2017 to 2019
$1.2M
NIA NIH HHS U19 AG023122NIA NIH HHS U19AG023122NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087221NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM087221NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM127667NIGMS NIH HHS R24GM127667
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein identification by tandem mass spectrometry sequence database searching is a standard practice in many proteomics laboratories. The de facto standard for the representation of sequence databases used as input to sequence database search tools is the FASTA format. The Human Proteome Organization's Proteomics Standards Initiative has developed an extension to the FASTA format termed the proteomics standards initiative extended FASTA format or PSI extended FASTA format (PEFF) where additional information such as structural annotations are encoded in the protein description lines. Comet has been extended to automatically analyze the post translational modifications and amino acid substitutions encoded in PEFF databases. Comet's PEFF implementation and example analysis results searching a HEK293 dataset against the neXtProt PEFF database are presented.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsProteomicsDatabases, ProteinHEK293 CellsHumansProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProteomeSoftwareAmino AcidsProteomeCometFASTAProteomics Standards Initiative extended FASTA format (PEFF)

Identifiers

PMID32106352
PMCPMC7483226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.