SynthesisHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2020
Endometriotic cell culture contamination and authenticity: a source of bias in in vitro research?
Synthesis in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Pharmaceuticals targeting signaling pathways of endometriosis as potential new medical treatment: A review.Medicinal research reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Microfluidic chip-integrated vascularized endometrial complexes: Mitochondrial function and paracrine crosstalk enhance regenerative potential.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- Endometrial Stromal Cells from Endometriosis Patients Reflect Lesion-Type-Specific Heterogeneity.Cells · 2025Article
- WERF Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project for Experimental Models in Endometriosis Research (EPHect-EM-Organoids): endometrial organoids as an emerging technology for endometriosis research.Molecular human reproduction · 2025Review
- Review
- PYK2 promotes cell proliferation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in endometriosis by phosphorylating Snail1.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Modelling Endometriosis Using In Vitro and In Vivo Systems.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Leveraging epigenetic aberrations in the pathogenesis of endometriosis: from DNA methylation to non-coding RNAs.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- Phytoestrogens: A Promising Therapeutic Approach for Endometriosis Management, Insights from Preclinical and Clinical Studies.Current pharmaceutical design · 2025Review
- Review
- Endometriosis: Molecular Pathophysiology and Recent Treatment Strategies-Comprehensive Literature Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- FDX1 enhances endometriosis cell cuproptosis via G6PD-mediated redox homeostasis.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2023Article
- PIK3CA mutation in endometriotic epithelial cells promotes viperin-dependent inflammatory response to insulin.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2023Article
- Role of Betaglycan in TGF-β Signaling and Wound Healing in Human Endometriotic Epithelial Cells and in Endometriosis.Biology · 2022Article
- Translational Applications of Linear and Circular Long Noncoding RNAs in Endometriosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Three-Dimensional Biofabrication Models of Endometriosis and the Endometriotic Microenvironment.Biomedicines · 2020Article
- ARID1A Mutations Promote P300-Dependent Endometrial Invasion through Super-Enhancer Hyperacetylation.Cell reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionAre the primary cell cultures and cell lines used in endometriosis research of sufficient quality? SUMMARY ANSWER: Primary cells used in endometriosis research lack purity and phenotypic characterisation, and cell lines are not genotypically authenticated. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The poor reproducibility of in vitro research and the lack of authenticity of the cell lines used represent reasons of concern in the field of reproductive biology and endometriosis research. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: In the present study, past in vitro research in the field of endometriosis was systematically reviewed to determine whether the appropriate quality controls were considered. In addition, we explored the performance of Paired Box 2 (Pax2) as an endometrium specific marker in endometrial and endometriotic primary cell cultures; we also characterised the most diffused endometriosis cell lines with respect to important markers including the short tandem repeat (STR) profile. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
methodsLiterature review part: almost 300 published protocols describing the isolation and creation of primary cell cultures from endometriosis were reviewed. Wet-lab part: primary cells isolated from 13 endometriosis patients were analysed by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence and FACS for the expression of Pax2. Cell lines Z11 and Z12, the most diffused endometriosis cell lines, were characterised with respect to the expression of Pax2, steroid hormone receptors and STR profile. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: From the literature review work, we underscored the lack of sufficient cell purity and phenotypic characterisation of primary cell cultures, which present high risk of contaminations from surrounding non-endometriotic tissues. Past work based on the use of cell lines was reviewed as well, and it emerged that cell line authentication was never performed.In an effort to address these weaknesses for future research, we present data on the performance of Pax2, a suitable marker to exclude ovarian (and other non-endometrial) cell contaminations from primary cell cultures; STR profiles of cell lines Z11 and Z12 were analysed and indicated that the cells were authentic. These profiles are now available for authentication purposes to researchers wishing to perform experiments with these cells.A quality control pipeline to assure sufficient quality of in vitro research in the field of reproductive biology and endometriosis is proposed. We encourage scientists, research institutes, journal reviewers, editors and funding bodies to raise awareness of the problem and adopt appropriate policies to solve it in the future. LARGE-SCALE DATA: STR profiles of cell lines Z11 and Z12 are deposited at the Cellosaurus database-web.expasy.org. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: There may be additional markers suitable to assess cell quality. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsFuture in vitro research in endometriosis and the reliability of outcomes can be improved by using the recommendations presented in this study. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study was partly financed by the 'Stichting Fertility Foundation' (The Netherlands). The authors declare no existing conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Non-applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.