Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32106256›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

PAPPI: Personalized analysis of plantar pressure images using statistical modelling and parametric mapping.

Brian G Booth, Eva Hoefnagels, Toon Huysmans, Jan Sijbers, Noël L W Keijsers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Brian G Boothimec-Vision Lab, Department of Physics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9228-4810
Eva HoefnagelsDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sint Maartenskliniek, Woerden, The Netherlands.
Toon Huysmansimec-Vision Lab, Department of Physics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Jan Sijbersimec-Vision Lab, Department of Physics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Noël L W KeijsersDepartment of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
University of Antwerp · BESint Maartenskliniek · NLSint Maartenskliniek · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative analyses of plantar pressure images typically occur at the group level and under the assumption that individuals within each group display homogeneous pressure patterns. When this assumption does not hold, a personalized analysis technique is required. Yet, existing personalized plantar pressure analysis techniques work at the image level, leading to results that can be unintuitive and difficult to interpret. To address these limitations, we introduce PAPPI: the Personalized Analysis of Plantar Pressure Images. PAPPI is built around the statistical modelling of the relationship between plantar pressures in healthy controls and their demographic characteristics. This statistical model then serves as the healthy baseline to which an individual's real plantar pressures are compared using statistical parametric mapping. As a proof-of-concept, we evaluated PAPPI on a cohort of 50 hallux valgus patients. PAPPI showed that plantar pressures from hallux valgus patients did not have a single, homogeneous pattern, but instead, 5 abnormal pressure patterns were observed in sections of this population. When comparing these patterns to foot pain scores (i.e. Foot Function Index, Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire) and radiographic hallux angle measurements, we observed that patients with increased pressure under metatarsal 1 reported less foot pain than other patients in the cohort, while patients with abnormal pressures in the heel showed more severe hallux valgus angles and more foot pain. Also, incidences of pes planus were higher in our hallux valgus cohort compared to the modelled healthy controls. PAPPI helped to clarify recent discrepancies in group-level plantar pressure studies and showed its unique ability to produce quantitative, interpretable, and personalized analyses for plantar pressure images.

Indexed as

AdultAlgorithmsCohort StudiesFemaleFootHalluxHallux ValgusHealthy VolunteersHeelHumansMaleMetatarsal BonesModels, BiologicalModels, StatisticalPrecision MedicinePressure

Identifiers

PMID32106256
PMCPMC7046232
OpenAlexW3008099406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.