ArticlePloS one2020
Factors that influence adherence to aspirin therapy in the prevention of preeclampsia amongst high-risk pregnant women: A mixed method analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Model Development on Adherence to Aspirin in Pregnancy: A Co-Produced Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Budget Impact Model of a Novel cfRNA Test-and-Treat Strategy for Preeclampsia in Advanced Maternal Age Pregnancies Compared with Current Guidelines.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2026Article
- Evidence and opportunities for preeclampsia and cardiovascular disease prevention in malaria endemic settings.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Lived experiences of women prescribed low-dose aspirin for preeclampsia prevention: a phenomenological study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Guideline adherence to aspirin prophylaxis use for preeclampsia among healthcare providers in Northwest Ethiopia: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study.AJOG global reports · 2026Article
- Clinical care team perspectives on universal low-dose aspirin in pregnancy.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of low-dose aspirin in reducing the risk of preeclampsia in women with chronic hypertension: an integrative literature review.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Review
- A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to low-dose aspirin adherence in pregnancy.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Changes in Low-Dose Aspirin Use After Updated Guidance on Sociodemographic Risk Factors for Preeclampsia.O&G open · 2025Article
- Article
- Medication Adherence During Pregnancy: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study in Bandung, Indonesia.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Low adherence to aspirin and calcium carbonate for preeclampsia prevention in pregnant women with chronic hypertension in a brazilian hospital.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025Article
- The value of a mobile educative Application additional to Standard counselling on aspirin Adherence in Pregnancy: the ASAP study, a randomised controlled trial.PEC innovation · 2024Article
- Assessment of Racial Disparities in Aspirin Prophylaxis for Preeclampsia Prevention.American journal of perinatology · 2024Article
- Article
- Preeclampsia prevention: a survey study on knowledge and practice among prenatal care providers in Ethiopia.AJOG global reports · 2024Article
- Low-Dose Aspirin after ASPRE-More Questions Than Answers? Current International Approach after PE Screening in the First Trimester.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- A socioecological description of the influencing factors to midwives' management of preeclampsia in a Ghanaian tertiary hospital.PloS one · 2023Article
- Estimated Prevalence of Risk Factors for Preeclampsia Among Individuals Giving Birth in the US in 2019.JAMA network open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-adherence with medications in pregnancy is increasingly recognized and often results in a higher rate of preventable maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Non-adherence with prophylactic aspirin amongst high-risk pregnant women is associated with higher incidence of preeclampsia, preterm delivery and intrauterine growth restriction. Yet, the factors that influences adherence with aspirin in pregnancy, from the women's perspective, remains poorly understood.
objectiveThe study is aimed at understanding the factors, from the women's perspective, that influenced adherence with prophylactic aspirin in their pregnancy. STUDY
designA sequential-exploratory designed mixed methods quantitative (n = 122) and qualitative (n = 6) survey of women with recent high-risk pregnancy necessitating antenatal prophylactic aspirin was utilized. Women recruited underwent their antenatal care in one of three high-risk pregnancy clinics within the South Western Sydney Local Health District, Australia. The quantitative study was done through an electronic anonymous survey and the qualitative study was conducted through a face-to-face interview. Data obtained was analysed against women's adherence with aspirin utilizing phi correlation (φ) with significance set at <0.05.
resultsTwo key themes, from the women's perspective, that influenced their adherence with aspirin in pregnancy were identified; (1) pill burden and non-intention omission (2) communication and relationship with health care provider (HCP). Pill burden and its associated non-intentional omission, both strongly corelated with reduced adherence (Φ = 0.8, p = 0.02, Φ = 0.8, p<0.01) whilst the use of reminder strategies minimized accidental omission and improved adherence (Φ = 0.9, p<0.01). Consistent communication between HCPs and a good patient-HCP relationship was strongly associated with improved adherence (Φ = 0.7, p = 0.04, Φ = 0.9, p = <0.01) and more importantly was found to play an important role in alleviating factors that had potentials to negatively influence adherence with aspirin in pregnancy.
conclusionThis study identified factors that both positively and negatively influenced adherence with aspirin amongst high-risk pregnant women. Is highlights the importance in recognizing the impact of pill burden in pregnancy and the need to counsel women on the utility of reminder strategies to minimize non-intentional omission. Importantly, it emphasizes on the importance of a positive patient-HCP relationship through effective and consistent communication to achieve the desired maternal and fetal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.