Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32105990›Full record

ArticleTranslational oncology2020

hERG1 and HIF-2α Behave as Biomarkers of Positive Response to Bevacizumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Jessica Iorio, Elena Lastraioli, Lorenzo Tofani, Giulia Petroni, Lorenzo Antonuzzo, Luca Messerini, Giuseppe Perrone, Damiano Caputo, Maria Francesconi, Maria Michelina Amato and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Transcriptional Landscape ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Influence of Kv11.1 (hERG1) KPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. KFrontiers in pharmacology · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica IorioDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Italy; Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Italy.
Elena LastraioliDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Italy.
Lorenzo TofaniDepartment of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Giulia PetroniDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Italy.
Lorenzo AntonuzzoDepartment of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Italy; Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Luca MesseriniDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Italy.
Giuseppe PerroneDepartment of Pathology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Italy.
Damiano CaputoDepartment of General Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Italy.
Maria FrancesconiDepartment of Pathology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Italy.
Maria Michelina AmatoDepartment of Pathology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Italy.
Moris CadeiInstitute of Pathology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Giuseppina ArcangeliDepartment of Medical Oncology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Vincenzo VillanacciInstitute of Pathology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Luca BoniDepartment of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Roberto CoppolaDepartment of General Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Italy.
Francesco Di CostanzoMedical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Annarosa ArcangeliDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Italy. Electronic address: annarosa.arcangeli@unifi.it.
University of Florence · ITUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITUniversity of Siena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn search of novel biomarkers of response to bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), we analyzed the expression and prognostic role of several proteins related to angiogenesis.

methodsA retrospective, multicenter study on 80 surgical samples from mCRC patients treated in first line with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy was accomplished. The following proteins were analyzed by immunohistochemistry: hERG1 potassium channel, β1-integrin, pAKT, NFkB, HIF-1α, HIF-2α, p53, VEGF-A, GLUT-1, and CA-IX. Data were analyzed in conjunction with the clinicopathological characteristics of the patients, KRAS status, response to bevacizumab, and follow-up.

results(1) All the proteins were expressed in the samples, with statistically significant associations between HIF-1α and gender, HIF-2α and left colon, hERG1 and VEGF-A, β1-integrin and HIF-2α, GLUT-1 and both HIF-1α and HIF-2α, and CA-IX and VEGF-A. (2) At the univariate analysis, positivity for hERG1, VEGF-A, and the active form of HIF-2α (aHIF-2α), and the G3 histological grade showed a positive impact on progression-free survival (PFS). (3) hERG1 and aHIF-2α maintained their positive impact on PFS at the multivariate analysis. (4) hERG1 behaved as a protective factor for PFS independently on KRAS status.

conclusionshERG1 and aHIF-2α might help to identify patients who would benefit from bevacizumab treatment.

Identifiers

PMID32105990
PMCPMC7044526
OpenAlexW3006793395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.