Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32105436›Full record

ArticleUltrasonography (Seoul, Korea)2020

Distribution and malignancy risk of six categories of the pathology reporting system for thyroid core-needle biopsy in 1,216 consecutive thyroid nodules.

Hye Min Son, Ji-Hoon Kim, Soo Chin Kim, Roh-Eul Yoo, Jeong Mo Bae, Hyobin Seo, Dong Gyu Na

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The 2019 core-needle biopsy practice guidelines.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2020
    Article
  13. Re: The 2019 core-needle biopsy practice guidelines.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hye Min SonDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Ji-Hoon KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Soo Chin KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Korea.
Roh-Eul YooDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Jeong Mo BaeDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Hyobin SeoDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Korea.
Dong Gyu NaDepartment of Radiology, Human Medical Imaging and Intervention Center, Seoul, Korea.
Seoul National University Hospital · KRGangneung Asan Hospital · KR

Funding

Seoul National University Hospital 05-2015-0050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to present the distribution of lesions among the six categories of the pathology reporting system for thyroid core-needle biopsy (CNB), along with the range of malignancy risk of each category based on different diagnostic criteria for benignity in a clinical cohort.

methodsFor 1,216 consecutive nodules (≥1 cm) of 1,125 patients who underwent CNB at two hospitals, the diagnostic results based on the six categories of thyroid CNB were analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups according to prior fine-needle aspiration (FNA) status: second-line CNB for nodules where prior FNA yielded nondiagnostic or unsatisfactory results (n=57), second-line CNB for nodules with prior FNA results of atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) (n=303), and first-line CNB (n=856).

resultsThe proportion of nodules in each CNB category and the range of the malignancy rate for each category was as follows, in order from category I to VI: 1.8%, 23.1%-75.0%; 57.9%, 0.7%-16.7%; 16.0%, 13.2%-46.7%; 8.8%, 53.8%-56.8%; 2.0%, 100%; and 13.5%, 100%. First-line CNB was associated with a higher rate of conclusive diagnoses (category II, IV, or VI) (725 of 856, 84.7%) than second-line CNB with prior nondiagnostic or AUS/FLUS FNA results (241 of 360, 66.9%; P<0.001).

conclusionThe overall distribution of nodules across the six categories of thyroid CNB and the ranges of malignancy risk for those categories were presented in a clinical cohort. First-line CNB tended to produce a higher rate of conclusive results than second-line CNB with prior inconclusive FNA results.

Indexed as

Core needle biopsyIncidenceMalignancy riskPathology report systemThyroid

Identifiers

PMID32105436
PMCPMC7065982
OpenAlexW2999009563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.