Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32105414›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2020

Network diffusion modeling predicts neurodegeneration in traumatic brain injury.

Govinda R Poudel, Juan F Dominguez D, Helena Verhelst, Catharine Vander Linden, Karel Deblaere, Derek K Jones, Ester Cerin, Guy Vingerhoets, Karen Caeyenberghs

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Govinda R PoudelMary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0043-7531
Juan F Dominguez DCognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6715-1060
Helena VerhelstDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium.
Catharine Vander LindenChild Rehabilitation Centre, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium.
Karel DeblaereDepartment of Neuroradiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium.
Derek K JonesCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom.
Ester CerinMary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Guy VingerhoetsDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium.
Karen CaeyenberghsCognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7009-6843
Australian Catholic University · AUDeakin University · AUGhent University Hospital · BEUniversity College Ghent · BECardiff University · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 096646/Z/11/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTraumatic brain injury (TBI) is a heterogeneous disease with multiple neurological deficits that evolve over time. It is also associated with an increased incidence of neurodegenerative diseases. Accordingly, clinicians need better tools to predict a patient's long-term prognosis.

methodsDiffusion-weighted and anatomical MRI data were collected from 17 adolescents (mean age = 15y8mo) with moderate-to-severe TBI and 19 healthy controls. Using a network diffusion model (NDM), we examined the effect of progressive deafferentation and gray matter thinning in young TBI patients. Moreover, using a novel automated inference method, we identified several injury epicenters in order to determine the neural degenerative patterns in each TBI patient.

resultsWe were able to identify the subject-specific patterns of degeneration in each patient. In particular, the hippocampus, temporal cortices, and striatum were frequently found to be the epicenters of degeneration across the TBI patients. Orthogonal transformation of the predicted degeneration, using principal component analysis, identified distinct spatial components in the temporal-hippocampal network and the cortico-striatal network, confirming the vulnerability of these networks to injury. The NDM model, best predictive of the degeneration, was significantly correlated with time since injury, indicating that NDM can potentially capture the pathological progression in the chronic phase of TBI.

interpretationThese findings suggest that network spread may help explain patterns of distant gray matter thinning, which would be consistent with Wallerian degeneration of the white matter connections (i.e., "diaschisis") from diffuse axonal injuries and multifocal contusive injuries, and the neurodegenerative patterns of abnormal protein aggregation and transmission, which are hallmarks of brain changes in TBI. NDM approaches could provide highly subject-specific biomarkers relevant for disease monitoring and personalized therapies in TBI.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAdolescentAfferent PathwaysAtrophyBrain Injuries, TraumaticCorpus StriatumDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleGray MatterHippocampusHumansMaleNerve NetNeurodegenerative DiseasesTemporal LobeTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID32105414
PMCPMC7086000
OpenAlexW3007465749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.