Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32105174›Full record

ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2020

Assessing Health Care Burden in Glaucoma Patients with and Without Physical or Mental Comorbidities.

Michael Serbin, Beth Devine, Joanna Campbell, Anirban Basu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael SerbinThe Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, Department of Pharmacy and the Departments of Health Services and Economics, University of Washington, Seattle; Allergan, Irvine, California; and Neurocrine Biosciences, San Diego.
Beth DevineThe Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, Department of Pharmacy and the Departments of Health Services and Economics, University of Washington, Seattle.
Joanna CampbellAllergan, Irvine, California.
Anirban BasuThe Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, Department of Pharmacy and the Departments of Health Services and Economics, University of Washington, Seattle.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlaucoma is a collection of eye diseases that damage the eye's optic nerve resulting in vision loss and blindness. Treatment for glaucoma is primarily pharmacologic; however, studies have shown patients have difficulty adhering to topical regimens. The reasons for potentially poor adherence are numerous, including influence from a myriad of either physical or mental comorbid conditions faced by many glaucoma patients. Neither adherence nor associated outcomes have been estimated in these 2 groups of glaucoma patients.

objectivesTo (a) characterize glaucoma patients with and without select physical or mental comorbidities and (b) estimate differences between the 2 groups for 3 types of outcomes: health care resource use (HCRU; office-based/outpatient-based provider visits, emergency room visits, inpatient stays, home health provider days, prescription fills); health care expenditures; and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as measured by the physical and mental component scores of the Short Form-12.

methodsWe used first-year data from each glaucoma patient's 2-year panel survey in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) database, 2003-2014. Two groups were created using ICD-9-CM codes collected by MEPS to compare glaucoma patients with and without at least 1 selected physical or mental comorbid condition. Between-group comparisons in the outcomes of interest (HCRU, expenditure, HRQoL) were estimated using multivariable regression analyses while adjusting for socio-demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline.

resultsWe identified 2,928 unique glaucoma patients during the 11 years of collected data, including 1,539 (53%) who had at least 1 physical or mental comorbid condition of interest. Comparing those with at least 1 select physical or mental comorbidity to those without (n = 1,389), unadjusted HCRU and expenditures were greater in patients with a physical or mental comorbidity (all

conclusionsSome differences in HCRU and expenditures were accounted for by differences in baseline characteristics between those with and those without 1 or more physical or mental comorbid conditions, but differences remained after adjustment. Results suggest that glaucoma patients with physical and mental comorbidities may experience greater HCRU and associated expenditures, and lower HRQoL, when compared with glaucoma patients without these comorbidities With this knowledge, future work may include estimating the effect of the number of these comorbid conditions on each of the 3 types of outcomes. DISCLOSURES: This study received funding support from Allergan. During the time this work was conducted, Serbin was a postdoctoral fellow who was supported by a training grant from Allergan to the University of Washington. Campbell is an employee of Allergan. Serbin, Devine, and Basu each have nothing to disclose. This study was presented as a poster at the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Meeting; May 20-24, 2017; Boston, MA.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolComorbidityFemaleGlaucomaHealth Care CostsHumansInfantMaleMedication AdherenceMental Disorders

Identifiers

PMID32105174
PMCPMC10391198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.