Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32104727›Full record

ArticleJournal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures)2020

Impact of Intravenous Fluids and Enteral Nutrition on the Severity of Gastrointestinal Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Varsha M Asrani, Annabelle Brown, Ian Bissett, John A Windsor

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Examining the Nutrition, Oral Mucositis, and Gastrointestinal System Symptoms of Intensive Care Units Patients Receiving Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Gastroparesis in the intensive care unit.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Varsha M AsraniDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Room 12.085, Level 12, University of Auckland. Auckland City Hospital, 2 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand.
Annabelle BrownDiscipline of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Ian BissettDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Room 12.085, Level 12, University of Auckland. Auckland City Hospital, 2 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand.
John A WindsorDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Room 12.085, Level 12, University of Auckland. Auckland City Hospital, 2 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand.
Auckland City Hospital · NZUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGastrointestinal dysfunction (GDF) is one of the primary causes of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Intensive care interventions, such as intravenous fluids and enteral feeding, can exacerbate GDF. There exists a paucity of high-quality literature on the interaction between these two modalities (intravenous fluids and enteral feeding) as a combined therapy on its impact on GDF.

aimTo review the impact of intravenous fluids and enteral nutrition individually on determinants of gut function and implications in clinical practice.

methodsRandomized controlled trials on intravenous fluids and enteral feeding on GDF were identified by a comprehensive database search of MEDLINE and EMBASE. Extraction of data was conducted for study characteristics, provision of fluids or feeding in both groups and quality of studies was assessed using the Cochrane criteria. A random-effects model was applied to estimate the impact of these interventions across the spectrum of GDF severity.

resultsRestricted/ goal-directed intravenous fluid therapy is likely to reduce 'mild' GDF such as vomiting (p = 0.03) compared to a standard/ liberal intravenous fluid regime. Enterally fed patients experienced increased episodes of vomiting (p = <0.01) but were less likely to develop an anastomotic leak (p = 0.03) and peritonitis (p = 0.03) compared to parenterally fed patients. Vomiting (p = <0.01) and anastomotic leak (p = 0.04) were significantly lower in the early enteral feeding group.

conclusionsThere is less emphasis on the combined approach of intravenous fluid resuscitation and enteral feeding in critically ill patients. Conservative fluid resuscitation and aggressive enteral feeding are presumably key factors contributing to severe life-threatening GDF. Future trials should evaluate the impact of cross-interaction between conservative and aggressive modes of these two interventions on the severity of GDF.

Indexed as

critical illnessenteral feedinggastrointestinal dysfunctiongastrointestinal failureintravenous fluidsresuscitationsurgical

Identifiers

PMID32104727
PMCPMC7029405
OpenAlexW3006094899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.