Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32104665›Full record

ArticleIntegrated pharmacy research & practice2020

Patterns and Practices of Self-Medication Among Students Enrolled at Mbarara University of Science and Technology in Uganda.

Faith Niwandinda, Edward John Lukyamuzi, Calvin Ainebyona, Veronica Nambi Ssebunya, Godwin Murungi, Esther C Atukunda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrated pharmacy research & practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. People's experiences living with peripheral neuropathy: a qualitative study.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Faith NiwandindaDepartment of Pharmacy, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Edward John LukyamuziDepartment of Pharmacy, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0001-7147-8931
Calvin AinebyonaDepartment of Pharmacy, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0001-7593-3399
Veronica Nambi SsebunyaDepartment of Pharmacy, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0001-8155-9612
Godwin MurungiDepartment of Pharmacy, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Esther C AtukundaDepartment of Pharmacy, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-0045-0138
Mbarara University of Science and Technology · UG

Funding

Patient-centered mobile technology interventions to improve maternal health in UgandaK43TW011004 · FIC · MBARARA UNIVERSITY/SCIENCE/ TECHNOLOGY · PI ATUKUNDA, ESTHER CATHYLN · 2018 to 2022
$542k
FIC NIH HHS K43 TW011004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSelf-medication is drug use without advice from a medical professional. Proper self-medication can reduce health expenses and physician waiting time. However, prescription or over-the-counter drugs are considered unsafe when used irrationally. Presumably, university students can make informed decisions regarding their lives. However, there are limited studies documenting self-medication in Ugandan universities. This study sought to document the prevalence, patterns and factors associated with self-medication among students enrolled at Mbarara University of Science and Technology (MUST). PATIENTS AND

methodsA descriptive cross-sectional study was done on 385 medical and non-medical students. Data were collected by interviewer-led semi-structured questionnaires and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20. The statistical significance was considered as

resultsThis study showed a 63.5% prevalence of self-medication. Self-medication reasons were classifying illnesses as minor (33%), time-saving (15%), having old prescriptions (11%) and high consultation fees (9%). Not self-medicating reasons included risk of using wrong drugs (19%), insufficient knowledge (17%), fear of side effects (15%), wrong drug use (15%) and misdiagnosis (14%). Respondents accessed drugs from pharmacies (56%), friends/family (17%) or private clinics (15%). Headache relievers, pain relievers and antibiotics were most commonly self-medicated. In adjusted analysis, being female, existing allergies, and being in advanced years of study were associated with increased odds of self-medication. No statistically significant difference existed between medical and non-medical students regarding self-medication. Self-medication likelihood increased with a lack of access to medical services.

conclusionThere is a high rate of self-medication amongst female students, those in advanced years of study and those with existing allergies. Medical services access significantly reduced the chances of self-medication. Vital medical services need to be extended to the university students to receive information on medicines, diagnosis, prescription and treatment. More studies should evaluate the impact of a high rate of self-medication among these students.

Indexed as

drugsirrationallyover-the-counter drugsprescription

Identifiers

PMID32104665
PMCPMC7025657
OpenAlexW3005646009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.