Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32104642›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

Podcasting in Medicine: A Review of the Current Content by Specialty.

Andrew Little, Zach Hampton, Tanner Gronowski, Cameron Meyer, Andrew Kalnow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Harnessing Social Media to Enhance Nephrology Academia.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. An Evaluation of Emergency Medicine Core Content Covered by Podcasts.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Learning Through Listening: A Scoping Review of Podcast Use in Medical Education.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew LittleEmergency Medicine, OhioHealth Doctors Hospital, Columbus, USA.
Zach HamptonEmergency Medicine, OhioHealth Doctors Hospital, Columbus, USA.
Tanner GronowskiEmergency Medicine, Academic Life in Emergency Medicine (ALiEM), Boise, USA.
Cameron MeyerEmergency Medicine, OhioHealth Doctors Hospital, Columbus, USA.
Andrew KalnowEmergency Medicine, OhioHealth Doctors Hospital, Columbus, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Podcasts and their use in medical education is growing and becoming more popular, all while not knowing what podcasts are available for each specialty. Objectives To ascertain the number of podcasts available by specialty and collect basic characteristics of each podcast.  Methods This was a Google-based, investigational study of medical podcasts by specialty undertaken by all authors from January to June 2019. Search terms included "podcasts in ____", where various specialties were inserted to identify current podcasts. Results Over the course of a six month period, 19 specialties were investigated for podcasting content. Emergency medicine, internal medicine, and pediatrics had the most active podcasts. Obstetrics and gynecology, ophthalmology, and orthopedic surgery have the most inactive podcasts. Neurosurgery was the only specialty searched without any identifiable active podcasts. Conclusions While emergency medicine has a large number of podcasts, both active and available other specialties have less of a selection.

Indexed as

podcastingpodcasts

Identifiers

PMID32104642
PMCPMC7032601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.