ArticleStem cells international2020
Evaluation of Novel Stereotactic Cannula for Stem Cell Transplantation against Central Nervous System Disease.
Article in Stem cells international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomaterials-driven stem cell therapy for tissue repair and functional rehabilitation after ischemic stroke.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2025Review
- Constraint-induced movement therapy combined with mesenchymal stem cell transplantation promotes myelination and functional recovery by inhibiting PRKCD/MEK/ERK pathway in hemiplegic cerebral palsy rats.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- The Aging Immune System: A Critical Attack on Ischemic Stroke.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
- Article
- Evaluating the Feasibility of Hydrogel-Based Neural Cell Sprays.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Corrigendum to "Evaluation of Novel Stereotactic Cannula for Stem Cell Transplantation against Central Nervous System Disease".Stem cells international · 2021Article
- Potential Mechanisms and Perspectives in Ischemic Stroke Treatment Using Stem Cell Therapies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Clinical Trials of Stem Cell Therapy for Cerebral Ischemic Stroke.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Recent Advances in Cell-Based Therapies for Ischemic Stroke.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Robot-Assisted Stereotactic Microinjection Method for Precision Cell Transplantation in Rat and Canine Models.Cell transplantationArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell therapy for central nervous system (CNS) disorders is beginning to prove its safety and efficiency. Intraparenchymal transplantation can be an option for cell delivery; however, one concern regarding this method is that the transplantation cannula may cause additional brain injuries. These include vessel damage, which results in brain hemorrhage, and clogging of the cannula by brain debris and/or cell clusters, which requires replacement of the cannula or forced injection causing jet flow of the cell suspension. We compared cannulas for cell delivery used in clinical trials, the Pittsburg and Mizuho cannulas, to a newly designed one, MK01, to assess their usability. MK01 has a spherical-shaped tip with a fan-like open orifice on the side of the cannula, which prevents vessel damage, clogging of brain debris, and jet flow phenomenon. We compared the extent of rat cervical and abdominal arterial damage with the cannula, the amount of debris in the cannula, the force needed to cause jet flow, and cell viability. While the viability of cells passed through the cannulas was almost the same among cannulas (approximately 95%), the Pittsburg cannula caused cervical arterial injury and subsequent hemorrhage, as it required a significantly smaller force to penetrate the arterial wall. Moreover, the Pittsburg cannula, but not the Mizuho and MK01 cannulas, showed high frequency of brain debris in the needle tip (approximately 80%) after brain puncture. While jet flow of the injection liquid was observed even when using smaller forces in the Pittsburg and Mizuho cannulas, MK01 constantly showed low jet flow occurrence. Thus, MK01 seems to be safer than the previously reported cannulas, although further investigation is necessary to validate its safety for clinical use.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.