Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32104184›Full record

ArticleStem cells international2020

Evaluation of Novel Stereotactic Cannula for Stem Cell Transplantation against Central Nervous System Disease.

Masahito Kawabori, Aki Tanimori, Shinri Kitta, Hideo Shichinohe, Kiyohiro Houkin

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Clinical Trials of Stem Cell Therapy for Cerebral Ischemic Stroke.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  9. Recent Advances in Cell-Based Therapies for Ischemic Stroke.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Masahito KawaboriDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurological Cell Therapy, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3574-8380
Aki TanimoriDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurological Cell Therapy, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Shinri KittaDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurological Cell Therapy, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Hideo ShichinoheDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurological Cell Therapy, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2910-4711
Kiyohiro HoukinDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurological Cell Therapy, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Hokkaido University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell therapy for central nervous system (CNS) disorders is beginning to prove its safety and efficiency. Intraparenchymal transplantation can be an option for cell delivery; however, one concern regarding this method is that the transplantation cannula may cause additional brain injuries. These include vessel damage, which results in brain hemorrhage, and clogging of the cannula by brain debris and/or cell clusters, which requires replacement of the cannula or forced injection causing jet flow of the cell suspension. We compared cannulas for cell delivery used in clinical trials, the Pittsburg and Mizuho cannulas, to a newly designed one, MK01, to assess their usability. MK01 has a spherical-shaped tip with a fan-like open orifice on the side of the cannula, which prevents vessel damage, clogging of brain debris, and jet flow phenomenon. We compared the extent of rat cervical and abdominal arterial damage with the cannula, the amount of debris in the cannula, the force needed to cause jet flow, and cell viability. While the viability of cells passed through the cannulas was almost the same among cannulas (approximately 95%), the Pittsburg cannula caused cervical arterial injury and subsequent hemorrhage, as it required a significantly smaller force to penetrate the arterial wall. Moreover, the Pittsburg cannula, but not the Mizuho and MK01 cannulas, showed high frequency of brain debris in the needle tip (approximately 80%) after brain puncture. While jet flow of the injection liquid was observed even when using smaller forces in the Pittsburg and Mizuho cannulas, MK01 constantly showed low jet flow occurrence. Thus, MK01 seems to be safer than the previously reported cannulas, although further investigation is necessary to validate its safety for clinical use.

Identifiers

PMID32104184
PMCPMC7036105
OpenAlexW3006393487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.