ReviewClinics in colon and rectal surgery2020
Laboratory Tests for the Diagnosis of
Review in Clinics in colon and rectal surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical significance of toxin EIA positivity in patients with suspectedJournal of clinical microbiology · 2025Pooled it
- Advancing Antimicrobial Stewardship With Diagnostic Excellence: The Role of Bayesian Reasoning.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- In situ visualization of Clostridioides difficile phenotypic heterogeneity and single-cell morphology during gut infection.Nature communications · 2026Article
- History and Evolution of the HypervirulentMicroorganisms · 2025Review
- Multiple cross displacement amplification (MCDA) for rapid detection of toxigenicMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Lipidomics, Microbiota, and IntestinalInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Comprehensive review ofWorld journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Article
- Review
- Beyond the bugs: why toxin detection is key in two-tieredAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025Article
- Can Gut Microbiota Analysis RevealMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Therapeutics involved in managing initial and recurrentWorld journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2024Review
- Impact of the Reverse 2-Step Algorithm forOpen forum infectious diseases · 2024Article
- A Rare Case of Polymerase Chain Reaction-Negative Severe Clostridioides difficile Infection.Cureus · 2023Article
- Clostridioides difficile Infection in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Current gastroenterology reports · 2023Review
- Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile: A silent nosocomial pathogen.Saudi medical journal · 2023Review
- Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection in symptomatic patients: what can we do better?Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023Article
- Impact of Nucleic Acid Amplification Test on Clinical Outcomes in Patients withAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Prevalence and Seasonality of Clostridiodes difficile over 12 Years at a Tertiary Hospital in Brazil.Current microbiology · 2022Article
- Improving care for patients withFrontiers in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.