Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32103896›Full record

SynthesisDrug design, development and therapy2020

Potential Use of Microbial Surfactant in Microemulsion Drug Delivery System: A Systematic Review.

Mandana Ohadi, Arash Shahravan, Negar Dehghannoudeh, Touba Eslaminejad, Ibrahim M Banat, Gholamreza Dehghannoudeh

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drug design, development and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Surfactin-Like Lipopeptides FromFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Application of Biosurfactants in Medical Sciences.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Influence ofPharmaceutics · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mandana OhadiPharmaceutics Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Arash ShahravanEndodontology Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Negar DehghannoudehFaculty of Arts and Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Touba EslaminejadPharmaceutics Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Ibrahim M BanatFaculty of Life & Health Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine BT52 1SA, N. Ireland, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8964-2840
Gholamreza DehghannoudehPharmaceutics Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Kerman University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Toronto · CAUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicroemulsions drug delivery systems (MDDS) have been known to increase the bioavailability of hydrophobic drugs. The main challenge of the MDDS is the development of an effective and safe system for drug carriage and delivery. Biosurfactants are preferred surface-active molecules because of their lower toxicity and safe characteristics when compared to synthetic surfactants. Glycolipid and lipopeptide are the most common biosurfactants that were tested for MDDS. The main goal of the present systematic review was to estimate the available evidence on the role of biosurfactant in the development of MDDS. SEARCH STRATEGY: Literature searches involved the main scientific databases and were focused on the period from 2005 until 2017. The Search filter composed of two items: "Biosurfactant" and/or "Microemulsion." INCLUSION CRITERIA: Twenty-four studies evaluating the use of biosurfactant in MDDS were eligible for inclusion. Among these 14 were related to the use of glycolipid biosurfactants in the MDDS formulations, while four reported using lipopeptide biosurfactants and six other related review articles.

resultsAccording to the output study parameters, biosurfactants acted as active stabilizers, hydrophilic or hydrophobic linkers and safety carriers in MDDS, and among them glycolipid biosurfactants had the most application in MDDS formulations.

conclusionSynthetic surfactants could be replaced by biosurfactants as an effective bio-source for MDDS due to their excellent self-assembling and emulsifying activity properties.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsDrug CarriersEmulsionsGlycolipidsHumansHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsLipopeptidesPharmaceutical PreparationsSurface-Active AgentsDrug CarriersEmulsionsGlycolipidsLipopeptidesPharmaceutical PreparationsSurface-Active Agentsbiosurfactantdrug delivery systemslipopeptidemicroemulsionsystematic review glycolipid

Identifiers

PMID32103896
PMCPMC7008186
OpenAlexW3004841311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.