Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32103845›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of industrial ergonomics2016

Effect of a novel teat preparation system on upper extremity muscle activity among U.S. large-herd dairy parlor workers.

David I Douphrate, Nathan B Fethke, Matthew W Nonnenmann, Anabel Rodriguez, Robert Hagevoort, David Gimeno Ruiz de Porras

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of industrial ergonomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David I DouphrateUniversity of Texas School of Public Health, San Antonio Campus, Texas, USA.
Nathan B FethkeUniversity of Iowa, College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Matthew W NonnenmannUniversity of Iowa, College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Anabel RodriguezUniversity of Texas School of Public Health, San Antonio Campus, Texas, USA.
Robert HagevoortNew Mexico State University, Dairy Extension, Clovis, New Mexico, USA.
David Gimeno Ruiz de PorrasUniversity of Texas School of Public Health, San Antonio Campus, Texas, USA.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUniversity of Iowa · USNew Mexico State University · US

Funding

High Plains Intermountain Center for Agricultural Health and Safety-RenewalU54OH008085 · OH · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI STALLONES, LORANN · 2011 to 2025
$22.2M
ACL HHS U54OH008085NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008421NIOSH CDC HHS U50 OH008085NIOSH CDC HHS U54 OH008085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDairy production in the U.S. is moving towards large-herd milking operations resulting in an increase in task specialization and work demands. Large-herd dairy parlor workers experience a high prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms in the upper extremity. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of an alternative teat scrubber (TS) cow preparation method on upper extremity muscle activity among large-herd parlor workers, as well compare to muscle activity associated with conventional manual milking tasks.

methodsUpper extremity muscle activity was recorded among U.S. large-herd parlor workers (n = 15) using surface electromyography. Participants performed multiple task cycles, using both conventional and TS methods. Muscle activity levels were then compared across conventional manual and TS milking tasks.

resultsConventional manual milking tasks of dip, strip and wipe were associated higher muscle activity levels of the upper trapezius and anterior deltoid. Biceps muscle activity was greatest during teat dip and wipe. Forearm flexor and extensor muscle activity was greatest during teat wipe and dip. The TS system resulted in more desirable anterior deltoid EMG profiles, and less desirable biceps, forearm flexor and extensor profiles.

conclusionsResults suggest that the TS system is effective in reducing anterior deltoid muscle activation levels. The TS system also appears to result in increased biceps, forearm flexor and extensor muscle activation levels. Increases in muscle activation levels could be offset by reduced repetitiveness resulting from three conventional manual milking tasks being replaced with one TS task. RELEVANCE TO INDUSTRY: If parlor production requirements (e.g., quality and onsistency) are maintained while simultaneously reducing cumulative muscle loading and worker fatigue, then TS use should be considered in milking parlor operations.

Indexed as

Agriculture workersDairyErgonomicsFarmInjuryMusculoskeletal

Identifiers

PMID32103845
PMCPMC7043381
OpenAlexW2545122109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.